LG Lotus Elite ReviewLG Lotus Elite 8
It’s happening. Just a few years ago only the most high-end of devices featured a touchscreen of any sort. Today it has worked its way into low-end devices like the LG Lotus Elite. Don’t get us wrong, this isn’t a knock on LG, but the trend has not only made its way to the masses but has made its way to non-traditional devices. The Lotus was as non-traditional as it got, at least when it came to design. It was short and fat and awkward to hold when on the phone, but made up for it with a pretty good QWERTY keypad and decent specs. This time around the specs remain nearly identical- it has the same 2 megapixel camera, 3G, microSD and 2.4” QVGA main display- but the front LCD has been overhauled with touch functionality. So is it really worth the upgrade? Read on to find out.
Included in the box you’ll find:
• AC adapter
• 1GB microSD card
• Fashion hand strap
The Lotus Elite retains basically the same footprint as the original, but feels much different in the hand. It’s beefier, but not necessarily in a bad way; the Lotus never felt cheap, but the Elite feels very well constructed. LG is again targeting the fashionistas with a fancy flowery pattern adorning the housing, but like the original we don’t see anyone serious about fashion giving the Lotus Elite a second look. It’s just quirky enough to appeal to the masses though, which is the ultimate end game.
You can compare the LG Lotus Elite with many other phones using our Size Visualization Tool.
The outer screen is 2.4”, has a resolution of 320x240 pixels, features 262K colors and utilizes resistive touch technology. The quality is good, though it looks a bit washed out at times. It is responsive to touch, though the unlock slider wasn’t always accurate. It does offer a calibration tool but we still found it to be just slightly off at times. Below the display are stereo speakers. Flipping open the Lotus Elite reveals another 2.4” QVGA panel with 262K colors, albeit not touch. Though these are the same specs as the original Lotus, this new display is noticeably crisper and colors look more intense. It could just be the black bezel around it, but the colors seemed more vibrant compared to the outside panel.
We liked the keyboard enough the first time around, but LG has reworked it on the Lotus Elite with good results. The design is more visually pleasing, but functionality has also been added with dedicated keys for social networking, email and text. The keys still retain enough relief and clickiness that typing isn’t an issue. The 5-way directional pad is flanked by a Speakerphone and Back key, to go along with the traditional Send/End and soft keys.
Along the left side of the phone is sadly only a 2.5mm headset jack, the volume rocker and the microUSB charging/data port. The right side houses the Camera and Lock buttons, and at the bottom you’ll find the microSD slot. The camera has moved from the flip to the hinge. When the phone is closed the camera faces backwards and the touchscreen can be used as a viewfinder. When opened it rotates to face the user, allowing for easy self-shots.
Despite being over an ounce heavier than the Lotus, we prefer the feel of the Lotus Elite. It is still an awkward and uncomfortable device to hold one-handed for extended periods of time, but the added width makes two-handed texting better. Overall LG has taken a quirky design and made it better.
1. crd22 (Posts: 77; Member since: 15 Apr 2008)
I don't really care much for this phone, but it really bothers me that they would name it after the Lotus Elite (an old Lotus car, predecessor to the Elan). It's not worthy of gracing the Lotus name... Elite or not.
2. ace1122 (Posts: 237; Member since: 23 Mar 2009)
I dont really like this phone either especially when its covered with flowers. Thats a pretty dumb move for sprint bcuz idk any guy who would want a phone like this. Why not make it for any gender like almost every verizon phone?
3. douchka (Posts: 4; Member since: 12 Mar 2010)
Is it me or Phonearena always rates Sprint phones above 8, and any other carrier 8 or below? Same way cnet.com always rates ATT's phones way above average and any other carrier phone average or below? Must have something to do with advertising. I mean most of the advertisement on here are sprint ones... Just saying
4. Rumsha (unregistered)
IS IT AVAILABLE IN DUBAI?? PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF IT IS!!