LG G2 vs Nokia Lumia 1020
They’re not necessarily the best in this category, since they have their own distracting elements, but call quality as a whole is nothing more than average with these flagships. On the LG G2, its microphone causes voices to sound a bit unclear – while the Lumia 1020 is plagued by a weak earpiece and speakerphone.
Would you guess that there’s a huge difference between the battery capacities here? It could also be due to the optimizations found with its newer chipset, but the LG G2’s considerably beefier 3000 mAh battery permits us close to two days of normal usage, which easily outlasts the 18 hours of normal usage we’re able to obtain from the 2000 mAh battery of the Lumia 1020.
Ah yes, pricing always has some sway with all comparisons. In terms of cost, the newly available LG G2 is sporting that golden price of $200 on-contract, which is easier in the pockets than the expensive $300 on-contract cost of the Nokia Lumia 1020. Frankly, all the obvious reasons are here in this comparison that point to the LG G2 as THE handset that offers the most bang for the buck. Not only is it packing all the latest hardware, but LG has done enough tinkering on its own with the experience to pull it ahead of what the Lumia 1020 has to offer with its Windows Phone 8 experience.
Come to think of it, the Lumia 1020 is still notable for being the device to go with when it comes to shooting photos and videos, but the LG G2 isn’t trailing too far behind with its quality. Most of all, you’re going to be saving $100 by simply going with LG’s flagship, which is pretty substantial when you let that price difference really sink in. Who doesn’t want to save a cool $100, even more when you’re going to get something that undoubtedly has the superior specs and hardware?
1. zuckerboy (banned) (Posts: 898; Member since: 22 Dec 2011)
g2 wins all catagories except camera
4. LetsBeHonest (Posts: 1476; Member since: 04 Jun 2013)
the real comparison begins after gdr3 update.
8. tech2 (Posts: 3466; Member since: 26 Oct 2012)
That's a moot argument. You can't wait always wait for an update to make a comparison more 'real'.
An update won't fix it to a bigger full HD screen (even if the update supports full HD), increase the battery size, reduce bezels, improve the poor microphone or even significantly expand the ecosystem.
These are phone comparison not OS comparisons. By your logic, why not wait for Android 4.4 to G2 then ?
12. LetsBeHonest (Posts: 1476; Member since: 04 Jun 2013)
You got me wrong
i mean windows phone 8 currently lack lots of basic , small features which means alot to some people
and gdr3 and wp8.1 will or probably will bring or fill all those missing features. And hardware wise lg g2 wins (not notable in real life performance) . And gdr3 update said to bring support for quad core and higher resolution displays.
i mean the real comparison or great comparison will begins soon since new wp devices coming soon with gdr3 update like Lumia 1520 phablet.
33. oldhamletman (Posts: 72; Member since: 03 Sep 2011)
what are the basic, small features that WP lacks and Android doesn't?
13. LetsBeHonest (Posts: 1476; Member since: 04 Jun 2013)
"These are phone comparison not OS comparisons." iknowwww. But OS and phone (hardware) must work together. OS should bring support for higher resolution and quad core processor etc etc etc etc etc
that's why Nokia's, HTC's,Samsung's windows phone offering sticks with low resolution displays and last year processors. MS put strict restriction on their WP platform.
28. UrbanPhantom (Posts: 949; Member since: 30 Oct 2012)
tech2, you claim that it's a smartphone comparison and not an OS comparison, but did you know that the Lumia 1020 has built in hardware bluetooth 4.0? Microsoft has not written the driver to support that feature yet. In fact, the only reason why there is no 1080P display on the 1020 is because Microsoft didn't write the code for that either. It's a matter of playing catch-up on the OS, not inferior hardware delivered by Nokia. All of that is now Microsoft's problem, since it purchased the device and services segment of Nokia. However, there plenty of features Nokia omitted because Microsoft's OS wasn't able to support them. The GDR3 update will help, but it's time Microsoft took it's mobile OS more seriously, and update the code to be on par with Android.
On the other hand, the author of the review seemingly forgot to mention the horrible viri problem that Android phones have, while WP8 has no such problem at all. Malware issues do matter, and most people want their banking information and other private data to remain secure...
15. zuckerboy (banned) (Posts: 898; Member since: 22 Dec 2011)
I dont think that gdr3 brings major changes. Also lumia is bulky for me and this doesnt change by update
6. sri_tech (Posts: 188; Member since: 21 May 2013)
From the article I got this.
Lumia - Design, Keyboard, Camera,
G2 - Display, Functionality, Multimedia, battery
Tie - Processor, memory, Internet connectivity
14. raunak (Posts: 507; Member since: 12 Oct 2011)
It's kinda funny. From the spec sheet, it might look like G2 is better, but the only real world differences I see b/w these phones are that 1020 has FAR better camera and a better design whereas G2 has a better screen and superior nortification system. Waiting for 1520.
16. zuckerboy (banned) (Posts: 898; Member since: 22 Dec 2011)
design and keyboard personal matter . there is only major win for 1020 , a camera.
20. Pedro0x (Posts: 271; Member since: 19 Oct 2012)
Design is subjective, but I think the design is not that good. Ofcourse lumia will have a better camera, it has got that big bulk on its back, it would be very shameful if it didn´t win.
How can it be tie in processor? G2 has multiple times better CPU.
Lumia 1020 is relatively good phone but G2 gets you more for less money (except camera)
30. boolsheat (Posts: 2; Member since: 25 Sep 2013)
Don't forget OS stabillity and security. Also video
2. jeff_1 (Posts: 105; Member since: 30 Aug 2013)
no comparison..lumia 1020 is a different league from G2.
5. itsdeepak4u2000 (Posts: 3718; Member since: 03 Nov 2012)
As per hardware G2 is good; as per OS, WP performs superbly with less specs. while Android requires more powerful specs. to perform well; and G2's camera is very good but not comparable to 1020. In short, both are good IMO. Check same after GDR3 update.
7. CX3NT3_713 (Posts: 2278; Member since: 18 Apr 2011)
Nokia wins... LG G2, is just anothrr android device
17. nnjerzy (Posts: 123; Member since: 19 Jun 2013)
Your a joke and have to idea what your talking about this is a beast!!
19. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5993; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)
Except that the G2 will sell more than the L1020 for the simple fact that it is not constrained by a carrier exclusive. I hope MS ends carrier exclusivity when they close the Nokia purchase.
10. Salleh (Posts: 2; Member since: 19 Sep 2013)
I thought Lumia 1020 is now $199 at AT&T. Makes them equal at contract price
24. djripster (Posts: 138; Member since: 10 Dec 2011)
You are right on that... It has cost $200 for some time now... Wonder why PhoneArena chose to keep an outdated price
11. Edmund (Posts: 656; Member since: 13 Jul 2012)
Apart from gaming and multitasking, the Lumia 1020 is superior in every way (give me "clear black" over 1080p any day).
18. taikucing (unregistered)
lol, the only thing Nokia wins is the camera. The rest is crap.
Dual core? 1280x768? smaller battery? same boring design?
I'll take LG G2.
22. mousesports (Posts: 274; Member since: 28 Feb 2013)
dont forget to take my carrot to please !!
23. papss (unregistered)
Dude if you have ever used the l1020 its anything but crap.. That's a pretty ignorant thing to say.. Its more than the sum of its parts, it creates a nice package. I agree on the battery though.. It is pretty bad tbh as I'm lucky to get 7 hours out of it on slightly heavy use.
31. boolsheat (Posts: 2; Member since: 25 Sep 2013)
Again, don't forget OS stability and security... For a serious user those are important attributes...
21. papss (unregistered)
I'll take both please! I have a l1020 and mah soon buy the G2.
25. DFranch (Posts: 206; Member since: 20 Apr 2012)
That is the most fairly I've seen the 1020 treated in a review on PA. At least they are finally admiting it has the best camera, other reviews on PA try to minimize this fact. There is no doubt the G2 has newer hardware, but as others have said, the fact that WP8 is so smooth that it is competitive with a quad core G2, speaks wonders about WP8. I can't wait to see the reviews on the 1520, with similar hardware to the G2, it should be quite a beast. a 6" screen is a little to big for my tastes though, I'd prefer 5".
26. Berzerk000 (Posts: 4275; Member since: 26 Jun 2011)
I haven't seen how PA doesn't say the 1020 isn't the best camera phone in other comparisons.
1020 vs Moto X, the very first sentence in the camera category; "Pounding it into the ground like no other, the Nokia Lumia 1020 is without question the device that caters to hardcore shutterbugs."
1020 vs HTC One; "in each and every shooting situation, it’s the Lumia 1020 that comes out as the clear victor – therefore, it’s the choice we’d stick with. Not only are the Lumia 1020 shots sharper, offer more detail, and better color representation in conditions where light is plentiful, but it also excels more under low lighting too."
1020 vs GS4; "When we look at the overall package, it’s obvious that the Lumia 1020 has the cutting edge in many areas, like details and low lighting performance, which makes it the ubiquitous choice for serious photographers."
1020 vs iPhone 5; "Out of everything, it’s just the impeccable level of noise-free detail captured by the Lumia 1020 that stands out the most – while its low lighting performance warrants some adulation too. We’ll give credit to the iPhone 5 for also producing some amazing photos, but it can’t outclass the Lumia 1020."