Have you seen PhoneArena's gadget-dedicated sister site? Check out MeetGadget.com Close

HTC Touch Diamond Review

Review index

Posted: , by PhoneArena Team

Categories: Bookmark

Share this page:

Discuss44
HTC Touch Diamond Video Review:







HTC Touch Diamond 360 Degrees View:



Share this page:

Discuss44

44 Comments

1. numetheus (unregistered) posted on 20 Oct 2010, 01:55

AWESOME! At least they put in a browser by default that is not the standard IE. Pocket IE is great for tiny pages, but is woefully slow and renders complex pages well. Heavy browsing on Pocket IE was painful and cumbersome. Browsing on the iPhone by comparison was a dream, and that is one reason why iPhone is so popular. Give it a good browser, and it will be a good iPhone competitor ... not until then. I absolutely hate WM just because of the browser, and the alternatives for it render better, but still a clunky experience when compared to iPhone. The new opera may change that. Also, why resistive touchscreen? Capacitive is much better suited for finger use.

2. zephxiii (unregistered) posted on 08 Jun 2008, 08:51

The poor performance on AT&T is most likely due to the devices lack of 850mhz. I would imagine you were in a 850 area for AT&T, and often any 1900mhz isn't built out for solid coverage.

3. (unregistered) posted on 08 Jun 2008, 13:16

wow, how is average joe rating so high, usually would be complaining about the price and it so glossy and fingerprintable. and usually for corporate you would complain highlty about no qwerty keyborad, very biased opinions ah

4. (unregistered) posted on 08 Jun 2008, 19:33

how do you get biased out of that, and why would average joe be any different than other categories for fingerprints? sounds like youre biased

5. (unregistered) posted on 09 Jun 2008, 02:47

iPhone is also an expensive one, but everybody is getting one and even jailbrakes it! Its the same for the Diamond: with that design and interface it is targeted to both highend/business users and to the Joe who wants iPhone-like touch-thing.

6. VZWGuy1 (unregistered) posted on 10 Jun 2008, 13:03

how do I get this UI on my touch?

8. (unregistered) posted on 11 Jun 2008, 15:26

the touch doesnt have the power to run it

7. (unregistered) posted on 11 Jun 2008, 06:18

What about GPS? Is it any good?

14. (unregistered) posted on 17 Jun 2008, 12:12

It is both

9. (unregistered) posted on 12 Jun 2008, 18:55

do you need to be connected to the internet for the weather updates to work?

10. (unregistered) posted on 13 Jun 2008, 11:42

To answer #12 comment. Yes, how else are you gonna get updates.

11. Genious (unregistered) posted on 13 Jun 2008, 18:54

Built-in weather station, duh!

12. (unregistered) posted on 17 Jun 2008, 09:21

Quiksilver meter and worker ants in the phone. That's how they did it in the AAAWWWLD days.

13. (unregistered) posted on 17 Jun 2008, 12:12

Yep, that's how it wurked on my good ol' iPhone Classic -_-

15. (unregistered) posted on 17 Jun 2008, 15:27

Err... your first paragraph put me off this review. The original Htc Touch came out 4 months before the iPhone, so it was hardly trying to capitalise on the popularity of that phone!

20. (unregistered) posted on 27 Jun 2008, 19:02

because the iphone was announce before the touch so the touch was based on what apple was to release maybe?

27. (unregistered) posted on 22 Jul 2008, 07:32

anyone ever realize that apple wasnt the original creator of touch screen phones. why do you people always have to push the fact that every touch type phone is to compete with the iphone. i know some phones look way too much like the iphone, but that doesnt always mean that every new touch screen phone was made to compete.

16. (unregistered) posted on 22 Jun 2008, 00:57

that doess not look like the best internet on a phone at all. I did want to mention this but when I used my brother's ipod touch, the internet browsing was a lot smoother. When moving through a page, everything seems to flow with hyour touch.But everything seems so slow to me in the touch. When he flips through albums and pictures, the touch seems so unresponsive. Maybe its just that the guy doesn't really know how to use the phone that well. But what I like is how the very bottom bar looks very smooth and slides with ease wehn sliding through the menu. That's the only smooth and responsive thign that I've seen on the phone so far.

17. Barry (unregistered) posted on 23 Jun 2008, 19:15

Probably a dumb question, but I read the review and didn't seem to see this answered. Does Diamond have 3G connectivity? If not, how would the internet speeds compare with the 3G connectivity coming out for the iPhone 3G? Also kind of off topic, but the ability to sync with Exchange, use Word and Excel are big sticking points for me - are all 3 of these options available on the iPhone 3G or will I have to get a phone like the Diamond with Windows Mobile? Thanks again. I'm torn between the iPhone 3G, the Diamond and the Touch Pro so I'm not sure which way to go yet.

18. (unregistered) posted on 24 Jun 2008, 09:38

HSDPA means actually 3.5G, so the answer is yes. Actually iPhone 3G seems to support only lower speed 3.6 Mbps HSDPA while Touch Diamond offers 7.2 Mbps. However, probably this is not very relevant since in mobile phones, CPU/graphical processing power is becoming nowadays more critical than download speed. In terms of Word/Excel, the big differentiator between iPhone and Touch Diamond is the editing capability. Exchange should work on both platforms, still iPhone 3G functionality needs to be assessed. My advice would be: if you want a small/compact device go with Touch Diamond, if you absolutely need a keyboard wait for the Touch Pro, or go for the iPhone 3G if you like the iPhone interface,prefer more storage space for music and don't care about camera and size.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

All content (phone reviews, news, specs, info), design and layouts are Copyright 2001-2012 phoneArena.com. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part or in any form or medium without written permission is prohibited!
Privacy | Terms of use