HTC Titan II ReviewHTC Titan II 7.5
Video is shot at 720p, which is a bit of a surprise given that many 5MP cameras are shooting at 1080 these days, but the results were thankfully improved from the Titan. They were far from professional quality, but the Titan II did a good job with light adjustment and smoothly moving focus throughout the shot.
HTC Titan II Sample Video:
1. jubbing (Posts: 150; Member since: 20 Aug 2008)
7.5/10 is a fair score I guess. Slightly lower than Lumia 900's 8/10, especially with it's price.
2. bobfreking55 (Posts: 866; Member since: 15 Jul 2011)
i guess in the windows phone world, the titan is the lumia's only competitor.
41MP > 16MP
6. Schmao (Posts: 302; Member since: 05 Jul 2009)
41MP means it takes up MUCH MORE space. So they scale the image, and you get a nice low resolution around 16MP.
14. Birds (Posts: 1139; Member since: 21 Nov 2011)
No dude they combine the pixels. Every six pixels becomes one pixel so the actual resolution is around 5 megapixels. But if you note that the 808 actually takes photos at both 38 and 32 megapixels, well it is easier to see how it can combine pixels, making a super pixel of sorts. There is no down scaling, just combining pixels.
15. corrifa (Posts: 34; Member since: 28 Sep 2011)
Wouldn't scaling down be pretty much the same thing as combining them?
16. Birds (Posts: 1139; Member since: 21 Nov 2011)
Rofl in a way but scaling down - according to Nokia- creates lost detail but combining pixels doesn't. I kinda see what they mean. When they combine the pixels the the picture is encoded at the same size as when it was 38 or 32 megapixels. But when the pixels are combined, the resolution drops by five to six times. In other words, you can look at it like it is 38 or 32 mega pixels when the final product is finished. Its is just that the pixels are connected so if you were to scale it to five megapixels, view it at full resolution, it wouldn't have any loss of details as if you were to view it at the actual 38 or 32 megapixels.
23. neutralguy (Posts: 1152; Member since: 30 Apr 2012)
Hahaha. This guy doesn't really understand how pureview tech works.
25. Raymond_htc (Posts: 430; Member since: 06 Apr 2012)
41MP IS NOT LUMIA!!!! ITS PURE VIEW!!! SO I CAN SAY THAT TITAN II COULD SMASH LUMIA in one SWOOP.
26. bobfreking55 (Posts: 866; Member since: 15 Jul 2011)
i said "soon" bro. easy. it's a 100% sure decision that Lumia will incorporate Pureview in their next flagships.
3. Dameon (Posts: 31; Member since: 06 Mar 2012)
nice review..now im not sure if i wanna get a wp7 phone now or wait for apollo and see what they have in store
4. DontHateOnS60 (Posts: 864; Member since: 20 Apr 2009)
I was really hoping for the same set of photos as with the Lumia 900 so I could compare the two of them head to head.
5. REYNER (Posts: 187; Member since: 10 Feb 2012)
slight lags at times?!! lags in WP? really?! how often? what happen to htc+WP?! tsk tsk tsk..
8. snowgator (Posts: 3397; Member since: 19 Jan 2011)
It is tough to reason out 200.00 for a WP 7.5 device at this point. I expect HTC and AT&T to get this down to Lumina 900 levels, and then this will be a great option. I am hoping for a September/October WP8 launch, and these two devices need to hold the interest of phone buyers until Apollo turns some heads.
9. droiddomination (Posts: 203; Member since: 01 Dec 2011)
lumia 900 camera sucks bad. i can vouch for that. that is why i returned it yesterday. indoor shots esp are blurry and the flash doesnt light up a turd! windows needs to go back in the oven until Christmas i feel..we need duel processors, real cameras and more customization options...oh and another 100000 apps would be nice. otherwise ..i am liking what i am seeing but i am sticking with android for now.
11. Mozarrt (Posts: 297; Member since: 08 Oct 2011)
Somehow I get the impression you havn't actually tried the Nokia 900
12. Lucas777 (Posts: 2137; Member since: 06 Jan 2011)
from ur name i get the feeling u wernt very inclined to like wp7 in the first place.. if u actually tried it at all
17. Mr.Best (Posts: 79; Member since: 17 Jan 2012)
What? "Duel processors"? Are they gonna fight or something?
24. neutralguy (Posts: 1152; Member since: 30 Apr 2012)
Dual processors? Dude, clock speed issue only occurs on android phones because of it's OS. WP doesn't need that much of clock speed. And Camera? Wait until nokia's pureview gives a visit to WP.
13. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
Still HTC doesn't know how to utilize power or 16 mpx. N8 has 12 and is far more superior to this one.
HTC lame once again.
Fanboys used to say...mpx are not everything. HTC should listen to them.
18. dan_md (Posts: 66; Member since: 19 Oct 2010)
If camera performance and boxy design is not your thing, head for the Nokia Lumia 900: sexier, better build quality, and great set of exclusive apps especially Nokia Drive and Maps - two of my favorite apps from my Symbian devices
19. Nathan_ingx (Posts: 3152; Member since: 07 Mar 2012)
Do you guys ever notice?? There's always a "But..." in the conclusion!!
20. deadhead (Posts: 17; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)
I went to AT&T today and looked at the Lumia 900 and this.. the Nokia is way better looking and it feels premium compared to the HTC despite the fact that its cheaper by $100 on contract.
21. Non_Sequitur (Posts: 1111; Member since: 16 Mar 2012)
The Titan's camera is still beaten by the Lumia 900. Carl Zeiss optics? Yes please.
27. kickinpwnr (Posts: 1; Member since: 10 Aug 2012)
As far as the lack of customization mentioned, is that in comparison to an Android device. Is customization however comparable to an iOS device?
|Display||4.7 inches, 480 x 800 pixels (199 ppi) S-LCD|
Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8255, Single core, 1500 MHz, Scorpion processor
512 MB RAM
|Size||5.20 x 2.70 x 0.50 inches|
(132 x 69 x 13 mm)
5.20 oz (147 g)
|Battery||1730 mAh, 4.3 hours talk time|