HTC Desire 300 Review
The camera is fairly quick to boot and that’s a plus for impromptu shooting. The interface features large and easy to press separate buttons for image stills and video which is nice. Accessing other settings however is a bit complicated as even though you can fine tune things like ISO and white balance, these settings are often buried deep in hard to reach menus and submenus.
The actual image quality is not something to write home about. We’ve seen worse, but this is definitely below average. The biggest problem with images of the Desire 300 is their sore lack of details - they appear smudgy, mushy and definitely lack much needed sharpness. Contrasting scenes are not captured well either as detail in shadows and highlights is scarce. Colors are a bit overblown, but more or less okay - it’s the lack of detail that is the real issue.
If you take the camera indoors, the situation gets worse. The fact that there is no flash does not help. In general, images turn out darker than we’d like and noise also creeps in noticeably. Still, colors are more or less well preserved, so overall pictures are still usable, even though not very pretty.
HTC Desire 300 Sample Images Fullscreen
More popular slideshows
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 vs Samsung Galaxy Note 2
14 Oct 2013, 05:28
Apple iPhone 5s vs Samsung Galaxy S4
27 Sep 2013, 05:59
Samsung Galaxy S4 vs HTC One
26 Mar 2013, 06:51
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 vs Samsung Galaxy S4
15 Oct 2013, 05:44
Sony Xperia Z1 Compact Review
23 Jan 2014, 09:22
Google Nexus 5 vs LG G2
11 Nov 2013, 06:01
HTC Desire 300 Sample Images
|Taking a pic (sec)Lower is better||Taking an HDR pic (sec)Lower is better||CamSpeed score Higher is better||CamSpeed score with flash Higher is better|
|HTC Desire 300||4
|Samsung Galaxy Core||4.5
|LG Optimus L7 II||5.2
|Nokia Lumia 720||5.3
The Desire 300 shoots video in the quite low 800 x 400 pixel resolution, native for its display. On the small screen the recorded video looks okay. The footage runs at 28 frames per second and in reality it looks fairly smooth with almost no skipped frames. The sore lack of detail is evident once again, but we’d say that its relative smoothness makes up a bit and video performance looks better than image stills.
The 4.3-inch screen definitely provides enough space for those who like to watch video on their mobile devices.
Unlike some other HTC smartphones, here there is none of the sweet BoomSound front stereo speaker magic. Instead, the Desire 300 uses a single loudspeaker on its back that is actually not that loud at all and sounds tinny and a bit hissy. The speaker is positioned on the back of the device - just where one usually holds the device - so when you have the phone in your hands you’d often muffle or nearly completely mute the sound with your hand.
For music, you have the stock Google music app and HTC’s own application, and both get the job done well.
For video, you have Google’s great YouTube application on board and the built in basic HTC video player. The handset handled all formats we threw at it at native resolution, but we’d recommend downloading a separate video player in lieu of the HTC one for more features and a more flexible interface.
Headphones output power (Volts)
Higher is better
HTC Desire 300 0.59
Nokia Lumia 720 0.46
LG Optimus L7 II 0.41
Samsung Galaxy Core 0.28
Loudspeaker loudness (dB)
Higher is better
HTC Desire 300 67
Nokia Lumia 720 78
LG Optimus L7 II 83
Samsung Galaxy Core 76
3. tadaa (Posts: 169; Member since: 18 Apr 2013)
xperia m or l is way better and more powerful than this. or you can go for the sp for 50 bucks more. i love htc's design but the internals are really lacking. kinda like how sony ericsson phones of the past had gorgeous design but weak chipsets.
4. orca99 (Posts: 80; Member since: 05 Oct 2013)
$200 for an outdated phone with a large screen. Save some more and buy something better.