x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options

HTC DROID DNA vs Samsung Galaxy S III

0. phoneArena 05 Dec 2012, 06:22 posted on

Being the latest entrant in the smartphone kingdom, there’s no arguing the imposing presence of the super spec’d HTC DROID DNA. Simply put it, the smartphone is one immaculate piece of tech that’s a sure fire competitor ready to fend of the hungry competition this holiday season. However, in order for it be glorified and accepted openly as an upper echelon device, it really needs to show its worth to what’s arguably regarded as the most prestigious Android smartphone pushed out this year – the Samsung Galaxy S III...

This is a discussion for a review. To read the whole review, click here

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 06:50 8

1. straywish (Posts: 13; Member since: 03 Dec 2012)

Well SIII is still proving that it can give a tough competition to powerful beasts so far.

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 08:01 13

15. SuperAndroidEvo (Posts: 4833; Member since: 15 Apr 2011)

You are right about the Samsung Galaxy S III, BUT the HTC Droid DNA has that 1080p screen that is just literally to die for. Also let's mention that the quad-core Krait S4 Pro is more future proof than the dual-core Krait S4 Pro.

To me the HTC Droid DNA is just a VERY capable phone that is really future proof. I got mine rooted & there is word around the grapevine that S-OFF has been achieved.


posted on 05 Dec 2012, 08:48 10

18. androiddownsouth (Posts: 598; Member since: 02 May 2012)

All I can say dude is I LOVE my DNA. This phone is a monster, and the battery life is very reasonable for how I use it.

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 08:48 4

19. Captain_Doug (Posts: 997; Member since: 10 Feb 2012)

Can't wait for CM10.1 on the DNA.

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 09:49 2

27. SuperAndroidEvo (Posts: 4833; Member since: 15 Apr 2011)

I am with you guys 100%. The HTC Droid DNA is already is a vicious beast, & with a PURE AOSP ROM it will dominate.

Both RootzWiki & Xda have a Senseless ROM that just came out today. It's a Beta 1 BUT it's progress toward a PURE AOSP.

Check it out!

posted on 06 Dec 2012, 01:22 2

39. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)

doesn't matter what kind of screen it has.
16 gigs of internal memory and no slot for memory cards are a huge nail o its coffin.

posted on 06 Dec 2012, 08:17

40. SuperAndroidEvo (Posts: 4833; Member since: 15 Apr 2011)

Ok I am glad you feel the same way about the LG Nexus 4. lol

posted on 31 Jan 2013, 05:25

49. Zarak (Posts: 23; Member since: 21 May 2012)

Does anyone know the name of that home button sticker on the S III?

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 06:57 16

2. shnibz (Posts: 299; Member since: 18 Sep 2011)

PA just Admit that the SIII is ugly...everyone knows this. Droid DNA all the way.

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 09:31 3

24. Nathan_ingx (Posts: 3751; Member since: 07 Mar 2012)

Why would PA do that???
You want to go down the "Bias" road again???
Besides, SIII is one of the better looking phones...
That being said, DNA is better in my opinion, but i won't throw SIII like that!

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 10:14 3

29. shnibz (Posts: 299; Member since: 18 Sep 2011)

SIII is certainly a good phone. I just think much my like Galaxy Nexus that it's ugly as hell. Samsung has been making some rather unatractive phones.

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 10:16 3

30. androidlikeaboss (Posts: 40; Member since: 16 Nov 2012)

SIII looks good,but feels like cheap plastic

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 10:19

31. shnibz (Posts: 299; Member since: 18 Sep 2011)

Nexus feels cheap too. Especially compared to my wife's Razr and my old WP7.5 HTC arrive

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 11:27 4

35. amiroo (Posts: 269; Member since: 03 Sep 2012)

+1 shnibz.
still s3 is a good phone but not Against droid dna..
just see:
performance & Panchmark
build quality

samsung always is more popular for softwar..they are unique in this case..but most of softwar programs can port on the other phones..like direct call..
but design and builld quality never come back with up.

i think s3 couldnt beat one x in very aspect..one X+ is more powerful than s3 and beat it in very aspects..its clear about dna.

finally must accpet that droid dna best this year in total..

posted on 08 Dec 2012, 09:35 1

43. cripton805 (Posts: 1440; Member since: 18 Mar 2012)

You forgot to throw in the negatives of the DNA.

I dont think the DNA is best by a long shot.

posted on 16 Dec 2012, 14:01 1

45. nasznjoka (Posts: 401; Member since: 05 Oct 2012)

You want a pretty phone? C'mon men we need phones with unique fictionalized and not beauty it's a phone not a girl

posted on 07 Feb 2013, 11:42

50. Coolest4ever7 (Posts: 23; Member since: 07 Feb 2013)

if you want a pretty phone get an iPhone 5 for anything else Galaxy S III

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 07:03 2

3. Techsplash (Posts: 41; Member since: 24 Oct 2012)

if they are saying that the droid DNA is better then why have they given more review scores to the s3.

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 07:32 4

8. lzsbleach (Posts: 155; Member since: 20 May 2012)

Review scores are done based on the competition at that time. The GS3 got a 9.3 because nothing could touch it at the time and it set the bar higher for smartphones. This also proves the .3 deference because the GS3 was still the king after a few months on the market. No doubt the GS3 will be the phone of the year.

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 10:39 2

32. Techsplash (Posts: 41; Member since: 24 Oct 2012)

well.it is alresdy the phone of the year.

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 07:05 6

4. OHaZZaR (Posts: 131; Member since: 19 Aug 2011)

It's really amazing that the 6-month old GALAXY SIII can still hold it's own against all these new smartphones.

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 07:14 9

5. MeoCao (unregistered)

GS3 is 6 months old and looks boring now, GS3 has more software features but JB has made things like S-Voice obsolete.

DNA all the way.

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 07:20 6

7. darac (Posts: 2156; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)

All the way to hitting the wall of tiny storage.

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 07:34 6

10. MeoCao (unregistered)

haha, u guys live in the past now is the era of clouds.

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 07:45 1

11. tizz06 (Posts: 14; Member since: 17 May 2012)

we livin in an era of the cloud and data caps so the cloud storage could b your phone bills worse enemy

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 07:49 4

13. MeoCao (unregistered)

I don't hear ppl complaining about Nexus 4 with even less memory. Remember Nexus 4 were sold out on contract at Tmo as well.

I guess Wifi serves the well?

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 09:46

26. darac (Posts: 2156; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)

Nexus 4 is a bargain.
It costs as much as a midrange phone, but has the latest OS and tech.
You don't have to be a power user to realize the benefit of getting a Nexus 4.

As for me, I said it already - no way it could replace my S3, with that kind of storage

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 14:25 1

36. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)

unless you go to Tmobiles truley unlimited plan with no overages or throttle. then cloud life is juuuuuust fine. :)

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 15:35

37. androiddownsouth (Posts: 598; Member since: 02 May 2012)

I know Tmo works for you bro, but there are still too many places like where I live where Tmo is straight garbage man. Otherwise you are right.

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 07:49 5

12. SleepingOz (unregistered)

Sure, the GSIII is old now and I'd recommend the DNA over it to anyone but don't be in denial of the plus that expandable memory gives you. Not everyone's willing to waste money over data usage when one can access his files for free using a memory card.

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 07:52 2

14. MeoCao (unregistered)

Sure, 64GB will be ideal, but there are reasons that this monster is only 200 bucks.

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 09:09

21. lzsbleach (Posts: 155; Member since: 20 May 2012)

Yea but the GS3 is a classic, DNA is a better phone because of the specs but its not a classic, and the Note 2 got the DNA beat all the way, only thing better is the screen and build quality other than that Note 2 got it software wise.

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 09:34 4

25. androiddownsouth (Posts: 598; Member since: 02 May 2012)

But comparing the Note II and the DNA is comparing apples to oranges. They simply are not the same thing. The DNA comparison to the SIII is far more valid, imo.

posted on 11 Aug 2013, 18:16

55. xkorpio (Posts: 4; Member since: 11 Aug 2013)

so true.

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 07:18 3

6. darac (Posts: 2156; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)

Superior high tech horribly crippled by 12GB of storage.. just unacceptable.
Having the marvelous screen and inability to even put two full HD movies in the phone.
Having a top notch GPU when games that could use it go up to 3.5GB in size.
HTC really sabotaged themselves

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 09:05 3

20. chrisbo5 (Posts: 31; Member since: 26 Jan 2012)

i have to blame verizon waaaaayy more than htc, remember that the htc j butterfly has a sd card slot.

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 07:33 6

9. MalakiMills (Posts: 257; Member since: 15 Jun 2010)

I had the DNA (swapped for Note 2) and my fiance has the S3. Personally I would recommend the S3 first. The screen really is fantastic on the DNA, but the software is just not up to par at all. If you root I would recommend the DNA because you can eventually get better, but for anyone else the S3 just offers a superior user experience. That and things like removable battery, and storage are just nice to have.

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 09:15 1

22. lzsbleach (Posts: 155; Member since: 20 May 2012)

I agree with you man, the DNA is just a bigger One x with a better screen, other than that theres nothing new about this phone. I see alot of people running away from sense and it shows in the sales; sense is just not up to par, theres nothing wrong with it but it doesnt add anything either.

posted on 08 Dec 2012, 09:30

41. cripton805 (Posts: 1440; Member since: 18 Mar 2012)

I agree with botb of you. Some people like simple things. If I liked simple phones, I would have an iPhone. I like all of the effects and features on my GS3. People trip out when I let them look at my phone.

Also, what are people on when they comment on bad build quality? It's not bad on the GS3. Its just the gloss smooth feel that feels funny. It has the same build quality as many phones in the past.

Remember! Glass is the cheapest and weakest material!
Aluminum scratches and dents. Its all about preference.

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 09:31 1

23. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5993; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)

I agree with your assessment. The GS III software is more 'usable' than what HTC offers on the DNA. If one is not rooting, then the GS III is better. Rooted, the DNA would get the nod.

posted on 11 Aug 2013, 18:09

54. xkorpio (Posts: 4; Member since: 11 Aug 2013)

aman lol same thoughts here. I love the screen on the dna but the software is just crap seriously. ;( and like I mention Later??? Earlier???? Even if the DNA has a faster processor and quad core, it just feels so sluggish and under power compare to the SAMSUNG GALAXY S3, which is older ! lol

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 08:06 2

16. K_osss (Posts: 1; Member since: 05 Dec 2012)

Good review but am I the only one that finds the reference to "tits" in the Internet and Connectivity section humorous?

"...such as proper rendering, silky smooth navigational controls, and sharp details thanks to tits high-res displays."

It's an adjective in someone's vernacular

posted on 08 Dec 2012, 09:33

42. cripton805 (Posts: 1440; Member since: 18 Mar 2012)

i caught that too and paused for a minute lol

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 08:33 4

17. android78 (unregistered)

You cant go wrong with either of these monster android phones. I have both but im just a sucker for that htc sense, So if i would to pick one it would be the htc droid dna. You just cant beat that 1080p screen, quad core processor, beats audio, and htc sense. Im in love with my dna......

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 10:13 1

28. Thephonegeek (Posts: 118; Member since: 22 Nov 2012)

Truth to be told. DNA prove it against note 2, S3 is not a big deal in front of it. But only 11GB Native storage is a deal breaker.

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 15:37

38. androiddownsouth (Posts: 598; Member since: 02 May 2012)

I thought that too, but got my DNA, set it up, and was amazed at how much storage I actually needed for stuff I actually use. Got all my apps downloaded and put some music on it, and still several GB's of storage left.

And, HTC's media manager software for the DNA is sweet. Easy to send iTunes music to your phone no extra apps needed at all.

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 10:40 3

33. McLTE (Posts: 821; Member since: 18 Oct 2011)

When I purchased my Note 2, I looked at the DNA for about 30 seconds. It was pretty MEH to me.

The screen was great, don't get me wrong.. but besides that.. what else is there? A ton of negatives!

Sense - Rather have Touchwiz
Battery - small and non removable
storage - really??

for this shootout.. It would be a toss up for me. If I had to choose one of those 2, I'd probably DNA because it's a little more future proof than the GSIII at this point.

BUT.. luckily, I didn't have to pick one of those 2 and got the Note 2! :P

posted on 05 Dec 2012, 10:53 3

34. ghanemsam (Posts: 64; Member since: 21 Nov 2012)

and as usual phone arena still biased to samsung over and over and over they dont want to addmit that the the HTC beast is the best around right now

posted on 08 Dec 2012, 09:45 1

44. cripton805 (Posts: 1440; Member since: 18 Mar 2012)

Dear author. When you're going to make a bold statement about lagging and a choppy screen. Please TELL US when and where that happened. This isn't a 5th grade essay when you coule leave specifics out like that. Its like you just pulled that out of your.... hat. Did you make it up because the DNA processor is better? We will never know.

posted on 23 Dec 2012, 00:41

46. TitoP (Posts: 3; Member since: 23 Dec 2012)

I was so torn between these phones I spent 40 minutes at the store and then left without either. Now I've decided to go with AT&T for the 4gLTE, and will probably go with the Galaxy Note 2. I used to think I'd never think of my phone as a camera except for shooting traffic accidents or robberies under way. Then I saw the Note II's camera. As a graphics designer in New York, the thought of taking pics of graphic elements I like, then sending them to myself via AT&T's 4GLTE is powerfully tempting. What an awesome feature, too, to be able to write on the pics.

posted on 26 Dec 2012, 08:01

47. thecomputergenius30 (Posts: 1; Member since: 26 Dec 2012)

I have both phones (the DNA and Galaxy S3) Over all I like the feel and the phone quality of the DNA better. The screen is really nice. What is really a bummer for me is the fact that the rear camera video keeps focusing in and out as I take video. The picture quality is fine (not as great as the galaxy s3 but not a deal breaker either. Because of the rest of the features of the this phone I decided to keep the DNA and I hope they come out with a software upgrade for the Video cam on the DNA. Is the video livable yes, but I'd like it to the point of it not bluing out and re focusing in again.

posted on 27 Dec 2012, 06:25

48. cripton805 (Posts: 1440; Member since: 18 Mar 2012)

My reason for liking the GS3 is the external memory, removable battery, and features. I have had phones break or get damaged in the past, and the SD lives. Also, I prefer touch wiz and the extra features in the GS3.

It all preference, but those were the real deal breakers.

posted on 09 Jun 2013, 07:18

51. tehalley (Posts: 13; Member since: 03 Jul 2012)

I know this old news, but I just got a DNA for $50. I like it soo much better than the S3. Yes on card slot or battery door is a bit bad. These are no issue with me. The DNA has a much better feel & is a lot faster. The screens are no comparison, the DHA wins ands down. As always this is what me thinks! Happy DNA owner.

posted on 29 Jul 2013, 10:04

52. Devadne (Posts: 1; Member since: 29 Jul 2013)

Can I just say that having someone review this phone recently is very useful! Thanks! This comparison ended on the DNA wins but if you don't want to spend the money the Galaxy 3 is a better value for your money. That's when the DNA was $200 and the Galaxy 3 was $50. Now they're both $50 and I think the DNA wins, even without the door to the battery or memory card slot.

posted on 11 Aug 2013, 18:03

53. xkorpio (Posts: 4; Member since: 11 Aug 2013)

HAHAHA well some people just post for the fvck of it. I'm pretty sure we can all google the specs for both phones so lets not get into that. I have both phones. I got my galaxy when verion decided to cut the unlimited data plans. Then I just got a droid DNA a month ago. The screen is beautiful same ass galaxy s4 or iphone 4, 4s, 5. It's High definition at it's best. Is it better than the screen on the galaxy s3? you bet. BUT that about it that's superior to the s3. The camara on the dna sucks! I have BOTH phones and have taken various photos using both phones same circumstances. Now the tactile buttons are SOOO unresponsive, it's a joke. MAYBE its software and they can fix it with an update but.... NOT to mention LAG. I have a stock ROM. On the other hand my galaxy s3 it's just so fluid. LOVE that phone. I like the DNA, But I think HTC still has a lot to learn software wise. Build is excellent, but then again, I tend to buy phones every two years.... so is platic gonna keep me from getting a phone that runs buttery smooth ??? NOT REALLY LOL. Like a lot of people say, memory car is not a must for me, but it would definitely would be nice. Not to mention removable battery. Software wise also... anybody knows how .... on the sammy you can swipe from the top down to show the status bar on MOST applications , but on the DNA it's impossible??? ALSO this is not that important... but ... has anyone notice .... (my friend has a Galaxy S4)... The Galaxy S3 has the most powerful FLASH of any phones I have used.? The Galaxy S4 flash is SO underpower. Even worst than the DROID DNA!!! I know it's something that not a lot of people use, but if you are video taping a movie in low light conditions a strong flash helps a lot. ;)

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories