HTC DROID DNA vs Apple iPhone 5
Frankly, it’s yet another case of Android versus iOS – meaning, it’s a matter of personal preference. With the iPhone 5, we never get tired of seeing iOS as the more straightforward and easy platform to navigate. Certainly, some people will appreciate that aspect, but it’s simply lacking in the personalization department, which is the strongest part about the DROID DNA. Donning its Sense 4+ UI on top of Android 4.1.1 Jelly Bean, the DROID DNA’s experience adheres to power users – much like all Android smartphones as a whole.
Always there to help us maintain a level of organization, they both feature their own digital personal assistance services – Google Now with the DROID DNA and Siri for the iPhone 5. On the surface, they integrate with various organizer apps, but Google Now extends its worth outside with other aspects – like providing us driving directions, traffic conditions, and sports scores. Naturally, the two excel in the email experience, but again, the DROID DNA’s worth shows itself in the Gmail app, as it parallels the experience we get out of a desktop.
It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to know that the DROID DNA’s Sense keyboard is sporting the more spacious layout, while still being super snappy with its response, but the iPhone 5 still manages to deliver a great experience thanks to its equally quick responsiveness and superb auto-correct feature.
Processor and Memory:
No doubt, people will be impress on paper by the HTC DROID DNA, since it’s newer of course, but more importantly, it’s powered by a quad-core 1.5GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro chip with 2GB of RAM. In contrast, the iPhone 5’s hardware might seem insigficant in the face of its rival’s quad-core silicon, but regardless of that, its dual-core 1.3GHz Apple A6 processor with 1GB of RAM actually exhibits the snappier performance – though, to be perfectly honest, the Sense 4+UI is a bit more graphically intensive than the static look of iOS 6. Nonetheless, the two perform similarly with other functions and their executions are fast to match their high-end association.
For high caliber smartphones and all, it’s somewhat disheartening to know that there’s no storage expandability with either device. In fact, the DROID DNA is stuck with only 16GB of storage – while the iPhone 5 is available in 16GB, 32GB, and 64GB capacities.
Internet and Connectivity:
Continually a comforting item to see on today’s modern smartphones, both are blessed with 4G LTE connectivity for speedy data speeds. Beyond that, the web browsing experiences are equally smashing with the two, as they feature proper page rendering, slick navigational controls, and plenty of sharp details. Overall, you can’t go wrong with either of them!
At this point, it’s known that the DROID DNA is able to surf on other networks aside from Verizon, seeing that it’s also a world phone with GSM capabilities. And of course, the iPhone 5 is available in specific versions enabled for GSM and CDMA. Finally, they pack along similar connectivity features too – such as aGPS, Bluetooth 4.0, 802.11 a/b/g/n Wi-Fi, and mobile hotspot functionality. However, it’s the DROID DNA benefiting with NFC.
1. Izzy_V posted on 06 Dec 2012, 05:09 17 3
The ip5 looks like it's a tiny bit larger than the DNA's screen. We all know which one should have won, that bias though. Bias everywhere. :(
4. Izzy_V posted on 06 Dec 2012, 05:24 26 5
But it is. I'm an apple fan and even I know that the DNA should have been declared the winner.
21. SuperAndroidEvo posted on 06 Dec 2012, 08:43 17 1
The HTC Droid DNA is way more future proof compared to the Apple iPhone 5. I can appreciate an Apple fan who can admit when there is clearly a better device.
You are unbiased.
27. bucky posted on 06 Dec 2012, 10:00 2 4
The only real future proof android phones that can match apple are the nexus lines. Even the sgs3 (which is a great phone btw) is still on ics in certain areas.
30. MorePhonesThanNeeded posted on 06 Dec 2012, 11:05 7 0
Still future proofed, as only Verizon GS3 are left to get their update to jellybean. Carrier specific phones are the reason for the death of phones before their time with slow updates and the like. Once the Google initiative hits this should fix that crap, as all OEM phones will be required to have Vanilla Android and OEM tweaked Android and the user makes the choice on which to use.
45. iDroidWin posted on 07 Dec 2012, 04:47 0 0
I desperately want them to give us this choice between vanilla and OEM tweaked version of Android,
42. iDroidWin posted on 07 Dec 2012, 04:25 3 0
To some extent I agree with you. Irregular updates is a true story. For geeks, DNA is the winner. Future phones will need to have these specs to run all apps smoothly. I am already feeling the pinch because of my ancient hardware. But, even Android 4.0 is better than iOS 6 , infact I have met people who preferred not to update their OS from 5 to 6. Until and unless Apple decides to redesign its whole OS, I will stick with Android as even older iterations of Android are better than latest of iOS. Also, on android, OS itself isn't the only way to get all the new features. Already developers are providing Daydream, 4.2 keyboard and camera functions to 4.1. Also, old phones like iPhone 4 can't enjoy some of the latest features of iOS, not even after jailbreaking (which btw hasn't arrived for iOS 6). I am using HTC Desire with 4.1, never had any regrets with Android.
58. Berzerk000 posted on 09 Dec 2012, 07:06 3 0
Future proof, until you realize that HTC won't give more than 2 major updates to it, if that.
I love HTC (obviously), but what's the use of giving a phone such monstrous specs when you aren't going to update it? I doubt the DNA will see past 4.2, and if it does, it'll be way down the road.
And if you mention roms, then just about every Android device is future proof given the right amount of dev support.
106. miket1737 posted on 17 Mar 2013, 12:08 0 0
Why should the DNA have won?
It has a worse screen with worse color production and viewing angles, lower brightness the the iPhone 5 screen
Worse cameras then the iPhone 5 cameras
Worse build quality then the iPhone 5
The DNA is running a year old OS with no future support from HTC, so i will be on iOS 8 while the DNA is still stuck on JellyBean
Worse battery life then the iPhone 5
Slower GPU then the iPhone 5
Slower web browsing performance then the iPhone 5
Care to tell me how the reviewer was biased in anyway? Its pretty obvious your a butthurt Android fan
39. darkkjedii posted on 06 Dec 2012, 18:38 0 0
Y do u have to say you're not an apple fan dude? It's like people make a point to say that so the droiders won't pick on them or thumb them down. Not saying that's what u did, but screw these droiders they don't own PA. U should say what u want, if u did then more power to u. Who the hell r they...
72. kidtronic posted on 15 Dec 2012, 01:39 0 0
What the hell is a droider? You sound like the fanboy equivalent of a bigot.
74. Barbara posted on 15 Dec 2012, 19:28 0 0
Why do you have to start name-calling. What's wrong with being a Droider? I have a client at my NYC hair salon who got one of these HTC phones and LOVES it. She also likes taht it's on AT&T's 4GLTE vs. HSPA+. It's all about speed in this city.
31. neutralguy posted on 06 Dec 2012, 12:03 3 1
actually, i have to agree with phonearena. It's up to your personal preference in this matter. Their both great handset.
It's not bias. I see a clear and fair review here.
37. amiroo posted on 06 Dec 2012, 14:45 0 2
plz rw bw droid dna & lumia 920..
both are the best this year..
Dna = android
lumia 920= wp
43. iDroidWin posted on 07 Dec 2012, 04:37 0 0
The bias is in the language. I have been following PA for a long time to notice it. In case if droid performs better than iP5, than they prefer to write "the rival (iP5) matches the performance of ". If iP5 performs better, they write "iP5 is a bit better in performance". This kind of language can affect a consumers decision. Also, they have been playing down 4 inch screen size for far too long and the argument of thumb friendliness evades me. If thats the case, can we expect them to stick to 4 inch and 16:10 ratio? No. Apple will increase the screen size of future iterations. Suddenly, that will become the best design and best iPhone ever. Most people doesn't even know the best part of iP5's design. Its awesome battery life in a small lighter package. Infact, I would prefer 4S's design instead of 5's scratch-ophilic aluminium with a trade off on weight. iPhones are known to look beautiful. Its a shame you have to hide iP5's back.
48. iDroidWin posted on 07 Dec 2012, 06:14 1 0
Just read the introduction of both devices, and you will feel what I am trying to say. May be you can remove the sugar coating and be objective, but the same is not the case with everyone. People do make their assumptions subconscious while reading, which if biased, can affect their final decision.
69. bayusuputra posted on 12 Dec 2012, 00:01 0 1
PhoneArena is not biased..
they are just trying to be politically correct..
77. StretchDee1 posted on 18 Dec 2012, 13:54 1 0
I agree. You ever seem to noticed no matter what phone/tablet they put up against the apple they always say apple is the winner. Even though nothing has really changed since the first Iphone was released. There is really no sense in reading the review or watching the video you already know who they are going to declare the winner.
83. Jonathan41 posted on 28 Dec 2012, 08:40 0 0
I believe the DNA did win. PA seldomly ever out right says that the "rival" (Which implies that the iPhone 5 is the champion of these comparisons) is a better buy than the iP5. So usually when the reviewer says it all comes down to "personal preference" take that as the iP5 just lost. You don't have A vs. B comparison and then as a result say it comes down to personal preference. Especially, when The DNA has such obvious advantages over the iP5. Of course it comes down to personal preference. I though the point of these head to head comparison was to have an informed opinion on which phone gives the average user the most for their money. If that is the point then the DNA is the obvious winner but, if these comparison are just side by side reviews with no winners or losers then PA should treat them as such.
107. miket1737 posted on 17 Mar 2013, 12:10 0 0
No, its just the iPhone 5 has higher nits, thus making it a brighter, better screen
5. MeoCao (unregistered) posted on 06 Dec 2012, 05:27 17 2
Big vs small? Apple fanboys always use this argument: it's preference. Really? Now iP5 moved to bigger screen they claim it's big IMPROVEMENT from 4S and that they can't come back to the TINY screen of the 4S again.
Of course there are people who prefer small phones, but I'm sure that the overwhelming majority will prefer DNA's size to iP5.
There can be only 1 winner, DNA all the way.
6. Kuherrn posted on 06 Dec 2012, 05:31 14 1
I don't live in the US. But I know that HTC's sales went up because of this phone. Given a choice I would go for the phone with the highest value: The Droid DNA
The only sensible conclusion I could come up is that the only phone the Iphone 5 manages to beat is the Iphone 4S.
68. RiseAgainst94 posted on 11 Dec 2012, 21:09 1 4
How is this 10 thumbs up? There are more anti-apple people than there are Apple fanboys and such bias is really aggravating. I'm a Lumia 900 user and will never buy an Apple device, but at least I see that they aren't complete trash like people say they are. The Iphone has a better camera, better video, brighter screen, better viewing angles, more apps, (probably better battery life this comparison is really vague), lighter, easier to carry, etc. While I'm not trying to suggest that the Iphone is the better of the two devices, I am certainly not ignorant enough to say that the only phone the Iphone 5 beats is the Iphone 4s.
Lets remember that without Apple, phones would not be where they are now.
71. Kuherrn posted on 12 Dec 2012, 06:11 2 0
I am abusing Apple because they are the ones that come out saying that iOS 6 is the world's most advanced operating system and let's not get started on their ridiculous patents. So when they say that they are the best, we expect the best. When consumers don't see those claims being fulfilled, Apple will be criticized and be hated for. That is what I am doing, and that is why those thumbs up are for.
I will agree that me saying the iPhone 5 beats the iPhone 4S only is an over cry and I apologize.
But until Apple changes its way and stops suing everyone, there will more anti-Apple people than there are Apple fanboys
75. RiseAgainst94 posted on 16 Dec 2012, 08:34 0 1
And I completely agree with you. I hate Apple for all the legal patent bull sh*t that they pull and their over-hyping every aspect of their products, but I think people take their hate too far. They may be a terrible company when it comes to ethics, but their products are not the worst things ever made.
So yeah, I absolutely agree with you, I just think people bash Apple to bash Apple and are really close minded about it all.
89. Dommer posted on 07 Jan 2013, 08:04 1 0
Have you have ever invented anything or patented an idea? If you have, then you may understand the importance of protecting that which you have so heavily invested in.
Create vs Copy - that is what is stake.
90. Dave_B posted on 08 Jan 2013, 13:20 0 0
But of course. I mean, remember a few years back when Apple invented the rectangle with rounded edges? I can't imagine how people got by before that was created by Apple. We should give them more money so they can develop other innovative shapes.
73. caseball2051 posted on 15 Dec 2012, 08:24 1 2
phones would be much farther advanced without apple.
dont kid yourself. they have been holding back innovation for years. before you come on here and bash others you should stop for a minute and think abotu what youre typing.
76. RiseAgainst94 posted on 16 Dec 2012, 08:44 0 0
I would agree that they would be without Apple placing a patent on every little thing they think is "innovative" but it's also important to note that Apple were the first to really revolutionize the smartphone. They are part of the reason that we have the phones that we have today and it's ignorant to come on here and just start bashing Apple.
100. UNIT057 posted on 23 Feb 2013, 17:28 0 0
Wait what? Lets keep in mind Google was creating a BlackBerry OS competitor before they saw iPhone.
108. miket1737 posted on 17 Mar 2013, 12:11 0 0
Wait, Apple was making iOS years before it came out aswell so your point?
8. CODHP13 posted on 06 Dec 2012, 05:56 4 6
is this phonearena or iPhone arena? I accept that iphone's camera z bttr but vat about burst mode,group shot features of htc?
10. ghanemsam posted on 06 Dec 2012, 06:24 11 0
and HTC's monster win again yesterday against S3 and today against iPhone
plz iphonearena just admit it
11. Raymond_htc posted on 06 Dec 2012, 06:26 10 1
No need comparison- Droid DNA wins handsdown! No need to seee the specs.....its obviously better!
78. StretchDee1 posted on 18 Dec 2012, 14:06 0 0
I think apple is paying them to say otherwise.
12. wendygarett (limited) 3 days ago posted on 06 Dec 2012, 06:32 1 21
iPhone 5 I choose you!!!!
15. Aeires (unregistered) posted on 06 Dec 2012, 07:31 6 0
Basing my choice purely on the arguments continually made by Apple since revealing the Retina Display, I'd have to give the win to the DNA just for screen alone.
16. lzsbleach posted on 06 Dec 2012, 07:42 2 18
The point is the DNA is nothing new, all it has is a better screen thats it. The DNA is a blown up One x+ with a better screen. If the One x couldnt completely take out the Iphone 5 what makes you think the DNA will.
18. bubbadoes posted on 06 Dec 2012, 07:49 9 0
So then if it's nothing new, then what the heck is the iphone5...other than an iphone, 3g, 3gs, 4, 4s, etc. Your comment makes no sense!
22. lzsbleach posted on 06 Dec 2012, 08:54 4 3
Thats the point, everyone bashes apple for there increment updates but when Android does it, its the best thing in the world, I know theres alot of HTC fanboys on this site but to tell the truth HTC is the first to come out with everything but they still manage to finish last. You know why because Sense is mediocre and the mass think that way and thats why there on a down hill spiral. DNA is a better phone than Iphone5 but phonearena left it a tie because of Sense; thats the point I was trying to get across. Software will always beat hardware in the end because hardware will eventually become the norm and what your phone can do will be praised more than its hardware.
26. bucky posted on 06 Dec 2012, 09:57 2 1
One of the best points I'v read in a while.
33. Dave_B posted on 06 Dec 2012, 12:26 7 1
Sense can be disabled if you don't like it(HTC even releases tools to unlock their own phones). And, if you want to talk about software, what about Google maps? The DNA has it, while Apple banned people from using the app on their phone.
Swipe and Swiftkey are also android exclusive, as Apple doesn't want to "confuse" users by allowing them to change the Sacred Apple Interface.
And, on average, software on the Android costs less than on the iPhone. So, add that to the cost of also paying more for proprietary iPhone cables and adapters, and paying more for the phone to begin with.
46. iDroidWin posted on 07 Dec 2012, 04:52 1 0
Can you please point out which part of Sense if bad and if yes, which part is irreplaceable? Dialer? MMS? Launcher? Notification Drawer? Music Player? Calender? Notes? Widgets? Camera?
84. Jonathan41 posted on 28 Dec 2012, 08:59 0 0
Right! Can some one tell me why Sense is such "problem"? It's one of the best android manufacture skins but, still people love to hate it. Whatever problems you have with Sense believe me they no longer exist in Sense 4+ and if you still find problems, no worries you can just replace it with a home launcher or a rom.
32. Dave_B posted on 06 Dec 2012, 12:18 6 0
The DNA is the first and only consumer device below 9.7 inches with a 1080p resolution. It has a pixel density that's head and shoulders above the "revolutionary" retina display. It has a pixel density over 10 times that of some "full HD" big screen TV's. That's not incremental, that's a huge leap ahead. According to Intel, 5" premium smartphones aren't supposed to be reaching this resolution until 2015 - 3 years from now! (source: w ww.tomshardware.com/news/Intel-Higher-Resolution-Displays-Coming,15329.html )
Secondly, you say that "all it has is a better screen thats it"? Maybe if you read the specs, you'd notice that it has other nice features as well. It has the Snapdragon S4 Pro quadcore processor - the fastest smartphone processor on the market. It has two 1080p video cameras built in, featuring a wide-angle lens on the front one, so you can hold your phone and take a video or photo of yourself with friends. It has wireless charging, NFC, gorilla glass, a narrow body(so you can use it with one hand, unlike the 5"+ "phablets"), a soft-touch back(read: doesn't slide off of things easily), Google maps, a standard micro USB port, and hdmi output(with an adapter).
Note that the iPhone 5 has almost none of those listed features.
Sure, it has some flaws, but it is the best smartphone out there, for numerous reasons. And, it's cheap. You can buy them for $150 right now with 2 year verizon contract, or $600 retail. The cheapest iPhone 5 costs $200 on a verizon contract, or $650 retail. So, far superior and cheaper, as well.
38. lzsbleach posted on 06 Dec 2012, 15:21 0 0
Your right phonearena did not give credit where its due. You cant say the GS3 is better than the Iphone and then turn around and say the DNA is better than the GS3 but ties with the Iphone. HTC is usually the first ones to the market with something new but it seems like they can never finish strong. The DNA shows how hungry they are and how much they wana turn things around but will it happen or will Samsung continue to be the king.
17. bubbadoes posted on 06 Dec 2012, 07:47 10 2
PA will never pick a winner over the iphone!! They are so biased there! When clearly the DNA wins in every corner. DISPLAY, PROCESSOR, SIZE, FUNCTIONALITY, MAPS, ETC!!!!!!!!!!!
20. taz89 posted on 06 Dec 2012, 07:59 4 2
this is what i have realised too,they have no problem making the iphone a winner but when theres a phone that clearly tops tops the iphone they call it a draw and depends on what os you what...if thats the case then all phones that have different os when compared the conclusion should be depends what os you want lol
109. miket1737 posted on 17 Mar 2013, 12:16 0 0
Every app on iOS is better then Android, Google Maps is better on iOS then it is on Android(even Google admitted this)
Bigger doesnt mean better,
Build quality of DNA is a joke compared to the i5
The human eye cant discern the difference between 332 ppi and 440 ppi, plus brightness, color production and viewing angles are worse on the DNA
DNA will be stuck on JellyBean while iphone 5 will have iOS 8 and beyond
Both cameras are worse on the DNA then the iPhone 5
iPhone 5 beats the DNA in browser speed tests
iphone 5 is lighter, more durable and has a better build quality over the Droid DNA.
23. lzsbleach posted on 06 Dec 2012, 09:00 0 0
Not true because they actually gave GS3 the win over the Iphone5.
"Ultimately, it’s the TouchWiz Nature UX experience and its extensive set of functionality that makes the SGSIII the more productive and complete handset between the two."
25. androiddownsouth posted on 06 Dec 2012, 09:56 3 0
And then they gave the DNA a slight win over the GSIII, so what sense does it make that the DNA and the iP5 tie when GSIII > iP5 and DNA > GSIII?
28. lzsbleach posted on 06 Dec 2012, 10:13 3 0
You have a point. Phone arena logic is out of whack.
29. lzsbleach posted on 06 Dec 2012, 10:23 1 0
I guess its one of those things when Water beats Fire and Fire beats Leaf but Leaf beats Water.
40. androiddownsouth posted on 06 Dec 2012, 19:35 1 0
Guess maybe they didn't give it the old Rock Paper Scissors Lizard Spock try lol.
35. -box- posted on 06 Dec 2012, 12:47 0 0
I direct your attention to the Lumia 920 vs ip5 face off. IPhail lost.