HP TouchPad vs Apple iPad 2
Being on the cutting edge of technology, both tablets are undoubtedly modernized with their dual-core processors – it’s a 1GHz Apple A5 CPU with the iPad 2 and a 1.2GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon processor with the TouchPad. Right off the bat, the iPad 2 shows off its more responsive performance and doesn’t really stutter to a crawl at any point. Oppositely, the HP TouchPad works great when it’s actually being cooperative, but it doesn’t exude the same fluidity to match the iPad 2. Moreover, we experience some random bouts of slowdown, lock ups, choppiness, and crashes with the TouchPad’s webOS 3.0 platform. Overall, there’s no kidding that these two are powerful enough to handle just about anything handed to them, but the iPad 2 takes the edge in terms of general responsiveness.
Visually, the two opposing platforms aren’t built from scratch, but rather, they employ the same look and feel of their smartphone counterparts – while still being optimized for the tablet medium. To tell you the truth, we absolutely love the straightforwardness and simplicity offered by iOS and webOS – but even more when they have very low learning curves. However, webOS 3.0 incorporates more gestures with its operation and keeps things flowing with its engaging experience.
multi-tasking, it’s definitely refreshing nowadays to find a form of it available with Apple’s iOS – and even though it works with the iPad 2, it’s not the best implementation we’ve seen. Knowing that, we have to applaud HP for its take on the ubiquitous task of presenting a sensual experience with multi-tasking on the TouchPad. In fact, we like its more dynamic and engaging approach, while seamlessly works with other elements like its cards system and stacking feature. Ultimately, multi-tasking in webOS 3.0 isn’t an astoundingly new experience, but when you compare it to iOS, it’s by far higher up in the totem pole.
In addition, the notifications system with webOS 3.0 is fashionably preferred since it’s unobtrusive and accessible via the status bar. In comparison, iOS has by far been notoriously resistant to change seeing that it utilizes the same exact notifications system that’s been available with the platform since day one. Thankfully, this will be fixed with iOS 5.
on-screen keyboard, but we do like that the webOS 3.0 keyboard features the convenience of a dedicated row for numbers. Besides that, our speed can sometimes be limited with the TouchPad mainly because it’s marred by random delays that can be rather frustrating at times. And even though both on-screen keyboards present suitable layouts to make it comfortable to type, we prefer the more consistent and stable experience of the iPad 2 by far.
On the surface, their respective email apps might appear to be the same in terms of layout, but the iPad 2 actually features a tiered format, while the TouchPad relies on a three-panel interface. Nonetheless, they’re both functional at their core in viewing and composing emails, but the TouchPad’s useful organization with its rearrangeable presentation is indeed preferred. However, it’s rather strange to find the TouchPad missing out on features like threaded conversations and the ability to multi-select messages, which are increasingly becoming standard amongst email clients with most devices.
Placing our attention on their organizer apps, there isn’t anything drastically different between the two. Interestingly though, we like how Synergy plays a crucial role in bringing together some of the TouchPad’s core apps – like having access to social networking profile information within the address book. With the calendars however, there’s no denying the amount of unused space found with their layouts, but the iPad 2 manages to separate itself a little bit with its organized looking day view.
Internet and Connectivity:
As we mentioned already, the iPad 2 radiates a more responsive performance with its general operation, but the same can be said about its web browsing experience as well. Complex web pages load up faster on the iPad 2, though, the slower time put up by the TouchPad can be related to it loading up Adobe Flash content in the background. Regardless, we’re still seeing more fluid looking navigational control on the iPad 2 – such as kinetic scrolling and pinch gestures. Obviously, the TouchPad doesn’t have the same level of responsiveness, but it’s nothing that bad at all because it’s still more than acceptable by any means. Additionally, the TouchPad has the prestigious feature of offering Adobe Flash support to give us that desktop-like experience.
signal strength on both tablets. Moreover, the same can be said about their Bluetooth connections as well. Surprisingly, the iPad 2 seems to get a fix on our GPS location much faster than the TouchPad seeing that it takes 10 seconds to get an exact fix – with the TouchPad taking roughly 20 seconds.
1. PimpStrong (unregistered) posted on 08 Jul 2011, 07:58 1 6
This is a blatent rip but it doesn't matter because its not Android.
2. davecann2 posted on 08 Jul 2011, 08:13 4 4
Why don’t you just face the truth... The iPad is the tablet to beat and it’s an awesome device that has not only a superior design but is factually one of the best OS’s out (open to opinion). Sure there are features of iOS that are missing that could be really cool to see in iOS5.
But its quality over quantity we are talking about. Android is saturating the market with half-assed tablets where only a small hand full are worth their price. You can’t go wrong by purchasing an iPad but I can’t say the same for most Android tablets.
8. PimpStrong (unregistered) posted on 08 Jul 2011, 13:47 2 3
You and everyone who gave me thumbs down misunderstood the comment. This(Touch Pad) is a blatant rip(off of the iPad) but it doesn't matter because it's not Android(whom is supposedly such a rip off of iOS).
I highly doubt we're gonna hear anybody bitch about how the Touch Pad's interface and it's body looks like an iPad.
For the record I have an Android phone and an iPad.
9. davecann2 posted on 08 Jul 2011, 14:26 2 1
Sorry, I did misunderstand your comment. I wish I could take back the thumbs down on your post. Thanks for clarifying
10. ghost_uwi posted on 08 Jul 2011, 14:40 1 0
I prefer the android (HTC) phones to the iphone but I prefer the Ipad to the other tablets. After using the Ipad quite heavily to do work on my thesis it is not without its limitations but what it is able to do it does it exceedingly well.
16. andyota posted on 12 Jul 2011, 15:54 1 1
Well, "have an IPad" justify your bad coment about the Touchpad that; how we can see, you don't know.
Doubt? Because the Touchpad's interface have nothing with the IPad's interface, only the pictures in this site can leave this mistake.
18. Stuntman (unregistered) posted on 14 Jul 2011, 15:27 3 0
You mean how the latest iOS 5 is a rip off of Android?
4. applesauce (unregistered) posted on 08 Jul 2011, 10:30 4 1
iphonearena strikes again!
5. herbie1960 posted on 08 Jul 2011, 10:43 2 0
It just all depends on what you need, iPad suits some people while Android and This Hp tablet suit others, it's not a which is better, it's what you need it for, I have an iPad and I love it, it's all I need but I can't say Android tablets suck because they are really extraordinary tablets as well.
6. hello143232 (unregistered) posted on 08 Jul 2011, 11:09 1 2
apple so should sue hp
21. ikkuh posted on 18 Jul 2011, 11:48 1 1
sure thats the only thing left when you losing the battle.
7. LXH (unregistered) posted on 08 Jul 2011, 11:56 3 0
why HP touchpad display is so dimmed ???
11. testman22 posted on 08 Jul 2011, 17:05 1 1
Played around with the touchpad at best buy and was extremely disappointed. The hardware is awful. It is overly heavy which usually translates to a more premium/sturdy feel, but not in this case. The size of it leads you to hold it in a position where the edges dig into your hand.
Software wise ut seemed very unintuitive and clumsy. I can see the benefits of the improved multitasking, but it would take a lot of getting use to. Certainly not pick up and go like the ipad.
Can't really see this tablet being successful for any niche or demographic. Its a shame, because I loved web OS, but this was just a poor implementation
20. cm005 (unregistered) posted on 14 Jul 2011, 16:34 2 0
The Best Buy demos of the TouchPad are HORRID. If it's one thing HP hasn't done right, it's the marketing. And for whatever reason, the demo that can't be shut-off on the best buy units make it soooo slow and clunky.
Sure, iOS doesn't have the same number of slight slowdowns and such that WebOS displayed, but it's not nearly as bad is the demo shows. My TouchPad rarely even gets a hiccup. It's fluid and fast.
Oh, and everyone seems to forget that the iPad does ONE THING AT A TIME. So it better be fluid as can be and get better battery life. Of course the TouchPad will get the slightest delay every once in a while when you're running a number of apps.
13. ArmageddonX posted on 09 Jul 2011, 20:04 2 0
It's a shame it runs webOS... if this was an Android device I would be all over the TouchPad. Not interested in another webOS device. I'll admit, I'm still bitter over the Legacy device lies HP/Palm told owners of the Pixi and Pre Minus... I need to get over it, but I haven't yet. I have a feeling it's too little too late for webOS, too bad because it's not bad. Not as good as Android but better than iOS.
14. xoomtoapple (unregistered) posted on 11 Jul 2011, 17:25 1 1
I have tried the HP..... the xoom is much better and it also just dropped to 499 and it's 32gb.....
However as much as I'd hate to admit it the I pad 2 is a far better device than any android device.... (at this time) I am returning my xoom for ip2 mainly due to 3g without a contract.... can't beat it.... however I will miss flash.
15. andyota posted on 12 Jul 2011, 15:49 0 0
Hey! This is a joke?
When is in IPad 2 favor, ecstasy! When is in TP favor, discretion and apathy minimizing the resources or saying that is equivalent to IPad 2, what is not true.
The ToucHPad screen is very dimmed in this pictures!
Unfortunately, I cannot imagine that is a serious comparison, there is no impartiality... :-/
Until today, I has other concept from Phone Arena... :-(
17. ArmageddonX posted on 13 Jul 2011, 19:16 0 0
Love the 4:3 aspect ratio's on these. I wish some of the larger Android Tablet manufacturer's would make them like this. At least a few models.
19. cm005 (unregistered) posted on 14 Jul 2011, 16:27 1 0
One of the better comparisons definitely, but you missed a few very important features I think:
1. Everyone goes on and on about the iPad 2's thinness, but nearly every reviewer leaves out the thicker Touchpad design is due to the inductive coils necessary for wireless charging. One of the coolest features of the Touchpad is the TouchStone charge and Exhibition. You didn't even mention Exhibition and the door that leaves open for developers.
2. Camera and Photos app: You mention the TouchPad lacking a rear camera, but honestly, who is going to take pictures with the rear camera on a tablet. It is truly idiotic. At the same time, everyone carries a camera phone with them at all times. The TouchPad's photo app pulls in your albums for all your online sources (ex: facebook). You take a picture with your camera phone, immediately upload it to facebook and in a matter of seconds, the photo appears in your TouchPad's photo app.
3. You did not mention the Touchpad's realizable keyboard. It can be sized at small, medium, large, and extra large to fit a wide variety of hands and also show more screen space when needed.
4. You INCORRECTLY said you can not multi-select messages on the Touchpad. That is not true. There is a multi-select button that you can press and then proceed to tap whatever messages you want to select.
5. Also with email, you neglect to mention that the TouchPad's email app is much more functional, especially when it comes to attaching files to a message. This feature is missing in iOS, but you can attach whatever file you like to your email message in the TouchPad.
6. You mention connectivity, but you completely left off the fact that the TouchPad can connect via bluetooth to any WebOS phone to both make and receive calls as well as text messages.
Honestly, there's plenty more, especially if you want to start discussing the homebrew support provided by HP, but that's a touchy topic for some.
Sure the iPad is a great device. But if you need to be productive vs. just being the casual media consuming consumer, then the TouchPad is worth every Penny. Plus, the prices are dropping.
22. flirt135 (unregistered) posted on 22 Jul 2011, 04:46 1 0
watch the video and it doesn't seem to have any difference at the user's experience between the two. the responsiveness is not much of a factor with a difference of a micro seconds. in my opinion, touchpad is a way better than ipad2 when performance and functionality is concerned.
23. Reader4knowledge (unregistered) posted on 24 Jul 2011, 08:01 1 0
Just goes to show that the author for this article was either lazy in his review of both iPad 2 and TouchPad or ignorant of all the features that were mentioned by the reviewer cm005 in his feedback. How could you have mistakenly left out so many cool features the TouchPad offers? I'm no TouchPad fan as I own a iPad 2 and I work for a competitor company of HP, but if I want to read a good review I want to hear it all so that I can gauge the actual quality of the devices going head to head. You leaving out important information for the TouchPad leads me to believe this website is not that professional in their reviews. Therefore, I will not be taking it seriously when I read articles posted from PhoneArena until proven otherwise.
24. kellybl131 posted on 30 Jul 2011, 11:38 0 0
Wow, it seems like this article was written by a junior high student who just finished learning about adjectives and adverbs in his basic English class. "Hmmmm, let's see how many words ending in 'ly' we can fit into one review."
25. chezzitstealer posted on 03 Aug 2011, 05:01 1 0
stop comparing things to the iPad its pissing me off! i mean sure the iPad turned the table for tablets put its a giant iPod!! i mean come on do you see a derferance no i don't and neither do you you just keep hidding behind your apple logo. you only like it because its a brand so STFU!!