GSM Cameraphone Comparison Q2 2007
0. phoneArena posted on 11 May 2007, 03:33
We've used five megapixel phones (three 3MP and two 5MP) to compare the top of the line cameraphones available on our market and see which performs best. See our 288 sample pictures in five tests ...
This is a discussion for a review. To read the whole review, click here
21. Ajith Kumar (unregistered) posted on 20 Jul 2007, 06:34 0 0
From the comparison of photos, one can easily see that the K800i lags behind N95 only in resolution and, in some cases, with colour saturation (which is a bit too much in N95). And yes, the macro mode is another thing. But look at the blurry GIF-like areas in almost all the N95 photos! Who would prefer that for a cool K800i?
22. noname (unregistered) posted on 27 Jul 2007, 22:41 0 0
Just look at the pictures..... no way for N95 to win.
23. m003z (unregistered) posted on 31 Aug 2007, 11:51 0 0
This is one of the most biased reviews i've ever read! I mean wtf i am a nokia fan myself and hate SE phones but you can't argue the fact that the k800/810's camera has better overal quality than the n95's. Just by looking at the pictures, the k800 displays colors more realisticly, unlike the n95(since when were skies purple?). So what the n95 has more resolution but half of them look so blurry and jagged that it wastes the resolution. Oh btw ever try turning ON the macro mode on the k800 before making macros?
24. xtorm (unregistered) posted on 14 Dec 2007, 05:22 0 0
very very nice review, alot of ppl is pretty obses with k800 rite? thx for the super effort and time spend in doing all the comparison!!!
25. rick (unregistered) posted on 21 Apr 2008, 16:37 0 0
I read that review and I know the k800i has a best camera than the n95 , a lot of people can make a lot of noise about that but , that macro mode test that was the most fake review I ever seen. just to show that a pickup my k800 and take my key picture u can see here http://www.4shared.com/file/44909387/2f03172c/DSC00030.html does this pictures is like the pictures of the review , and the quality , the macro mode of k800 can fight easily 1x1 to the macro of n95 -.-
26. bloody (unregistered) posted on 20 Oct 2008, 19:56 0 0
How much did NOKIA pays you to write review like this? In almost every aspect k800 had a better pitcture quality, sharpnes and colors! And I'd like to ask you a question, witch mani user, that has posted comment, asked you already: "Did you even and turn ON macro mod on K800 when you was takeing a macro pitctures with it?" Only this I have to say to you: "THIS REVIEW IS BIG SHAME FOR YOU PHONEARENA. YOU MUST BE OR BLIND OR CORRUPTED! SHAME ON YOU FOR REVIEW LIKE THIS ONE!
27. Mihai (unregistered) posted on 12 Jan 2011, 10:58 0 0
I have N95 and N95 8Gb, i cant get pictures like yours...they have 5mp for nothing. In artifical light its worst. And even so, if you look at the pictures, you can see that N95 was no better quality than the others...My wife was a Samsung SGH U600...a cheap phone, but i cannot compare my pictures with hers...the samsung`s are more realistic...and sharper.
