Camera comparison: HTC One (M8) vs Samsung Galaxy S4, Galaxy Note 3, iPhone 5s, LG G2, Nexus 5, Nokia Lumia 1520, Sony Xperia Z1S
- 1 Introduction & Colors
- 2 Details
- 3 Indoor
- 4 Night
- 5 Video
- 6 Conclusion
- HTC One (M8) specifications
- Samsung Galaxy Note 3 specifications
- Samsung Galaxy S4 specifications
- Sony Xperia Z1 specifications
- Apple iPhone 5s specifications
- Google Nexus 5 specifications
- LG G2 specifications
- Nokia Lumia 1520 specifications
Indoor settings are traditionally challenging environments to take photos in, especially when there's lack of sufficient lighting. The 2013 HTC One, in particular, almost always delivered poor results in the indoor stage of our previous camera comparisons. The new HTC One, however, seems to perform better than its predecessor. Its indoor shots aren't the most detailed (of course), but they are lively looking, with sufficient exposure. Sure, there's some noise in the darker shots, but that should be expected. The new dual LED flash provides a good amount of light even at a distance of 7 feet from the subject, and its use doesn't have a detrimental effect on the image's color balance.
As of the rest are well capable of
taking great photos if the subject is well illuminated. In dim light,
however, they start behaving differently. The LG G2, iPhone 5s, and
the Galaxy 4 will manage to produce a decent photo even if you choose
to manually switch the flash off, while the rest will leave the scene
dark. With the flash on, best results should be expected from the
Sony Xperia Z1S, Lumia 1520, Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and the iPhone
5s, although the rest of the phones can also produce a decent image
even at a distance of 7 feet away from the subject.
1. PapaSmurf (Posts: 10456; Member since: 14 May 2012)
Hold up.. S4 ranked higher than the Note 3?
4. _Bone_ (Posts: 2154; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)
It is an interesting battle. Most S4s are equipped with the Exmor R (SD600 versions), some with the Exmor RS (Exynos 5 versions), while the Note 3 packs a newer Exmor RS (both versions), that has higher level of detail than the Exmor R, but worse dynamic range. Of all the Exmors looked at here (S4, N3, Z1s, G2, N5, 5S) the iPhone does consistently the best photos, while I think the 1520 needs a SW update, cause it's far more capable than the results it's pulling.
Expect Samsung's ISOCELL to make all run for their money, bar the 1020.
7. PapaSmurf (Posts: 10456; Member since: 14 May 2012)
Photo #27 and #35 is where the Note 3 shines.
52. refillable (Posts: 1046; Member since: 10 Mar 2014)
Seriously? I have no Idea how the heck can a 1/2.5" sensor beat a 2/3" that was just been released a year ago?
5. Johnnokia (Posts: 1093; Member since: 27 May 2012)
It is really so absurd to Lumia 1520 in the pre-last rank ..
So silly and suspicious indeed!
8. Contreramanjaro (Posts: 153; Member since: 04 Dec 2011)
I usually just look at these articles to compare pictures on my own. I don't think I've ever agreed with PA on the results.
20. akki20892 (Posts: 3901; Member since: 04 Feb 2013)
We should compare photos with professional photographer.
58. The13thKing (banned) (Posts: 849; Member since: 26 Feb 2014)
It Hurts More Than Market Share Doesn't It ...?
and here you go, cold water thrown in your face.
73. utg001 (unregistered)
I think in some scenarios, the 1520, iPhone and Z1 out shine the others by a margin. Clearly!
16. sergiobr (Posts: 707; Member since: 25 Feb 2013)
PapaSmurf as a Note owner (like you) I must say that, in low or high light my phone takes better photos than S4 (I checked with my friends), when I shot with CameraPro is much better. I don´t know what PA is doing.
69. geordie8t1 (unregistered)
i agree, i have galaxy s4 and note 3, and for me it was MUCH more noticable in night shots, my s4 just could not do very well at all, my note 3 however on similar settings, performs probably twice as good, my night shots are crisp and clear for what i got, i dont really notice so much in the day time shots.
24. Ashoaib (Posts: 3229; Member since: 15 Nov 2013)
I accept, S4 and g2 are almost equal with a slight difference of saturation levels but note3????? well, my experience with note3 is way better, I experienced note 3 performing better then z1, better then s4 and g2 as well... dont know about lumias bcoz I dont bother myself to check nokia
56. sergiobr (Posts: 707; Member since: 25 Feb 2013)
My Note 3 can take similar photos with this ...http://cdn02.androidauthority.
85. KingaSpades (Posts: 45; Member since: 04 Nov 2013)
And that's how you know that the entire thing is bullshyt.
59. The13thKing (banned) (Posts: 849; Member since: 26 Feb 2014)
Here comes cold water for market share guy.
23. Nexus4lifes (Posts: 155; Member since: 13 Feb 2014)
Nokia lumia 1520 almost all flagships beat it..:)
45. rockers123 (Posts: 135; Member since: 08 Sep 2013)
You should have a look at MKBHD top 5 Camera phones
70. geordie8t1 (unregistered)
81. Hlorri (Posts: 40; Member since: 07 May 2008)
Uh... Except the Nokia 808 PureView! ;)
Still, 2 years after, the "king" of camera phones.
That said, the 808 (and even moreso the 1020) are not really the most suitable for casual/action shots. Both (especially the 1020) are slow to start, have long picture-to-picture durations, and have relatively slow exposure times (compared with, for instance, the HTC One).
The 1020 has Optical Image Stabilization, but that does nothing to prevent motion blur of the subject (and not the photographer).
Between my 808 PureView and my HTC One, I find that the One often captures the sharpest photos of my kids - especially if they're moving around. Of course the 808 takes the cleanest photos of still objects (nature and such) - though for that you'll probably want to use a DSLR anyway....
3. hmd74 (Posts: 477; Member since: 31 Jan 2013)
the question is when did PA get the phone to do the compare? :|
WTF? they reviewed it :|
42. KillerKeyboard (Posts: 344; Member since: 21 Nov 2013)
Embargo. Tech review companies get pre-sale units before the product launch with an agreement to only publish their articles in a given time set by the manufacturer.
6. HTCOE (Posts: 632; Member since: 20 Nov 2011)
umm?? they didn't look bad in camera comparisons for the HTC One but not the best either. i'll accept it... i hope they make a detachable lens like what sony tried to do with the QX
9. SlowPoison77 (Posts: 27; Member since: 30 Nov 2013)
htc one m8 photoes are stunningm better than expected from 4mp, i m ready 4 upgrade
10. FaisalWibowo11 (Posts: 163; Member since: 12 Aug 2013)
Phonearena.com's camera comparison is really inconsistent and unprofessional.
In the previous comparison, Z1 has a score of 8.5 in colour representation but now it only has 7.0.
In the previous comparison, Z1 was rated lower than note 3 and s4 in night shots. Now, the Z1 is rated higher.
Video scoring also changes now.
Jeez, I don't get it. Maybe someone can clear me up
12. PapaSmurf (Posts: 10456; Member since: 14 May 2012)
Because it's a different test under different scenes?
15. FaisalWibowo11 (Posts: 163; Member since: 12 Aug 2013)
Maybe true. Because any phone's camera performance can turn out differently depending on the scene.
Still, S4 and G2 rated higher than lumia 1520 and Z1 kinda bugs me considering lumia 1520 and z1 have larger sensors, oversampling, and better per ISO performance.
Also S4 being better than note 3 is also kinda weird considering they have the same post processing methods
39. Jason2k13 (Posts: 1214; Member since: 28 Mar 2013)
It's called software, obviously Samsung optimize it alot better. xperia Z and Z1 are a joke compared to note 3 or S4.
I've tried the Z1 camera soo many times, and its usually a hit and miss. Soo many blurred shots, even go to Z1 XDA forums of people talking about it.
60. The13thKing (banned) (Posts: 849; Member since: 26 Feb 2014)
71. geordie8t1 (unregistered)
well the note 3 has a slightly modified sensor and processing setup, which makes it ever so slightly better, having owned and used both i would say that in no way is the s4 better then the note 3, in low light my note is far better at taking stills
13. jerrycutshaw (Posts: 45; Member since: 27 Apr 2011)
Nick - In future comparisons please add in subjects in motion such as a car or person walking. As a parent my subjects are rarely sitting still!
I'm floored the LG G2 scored so well. We are on our 3rd replacement model. It takes excellent pictures of stationary objects. It focuses very slowly (if at all) and if the subject is even THINKING about moving you get alot of ghosting. I've compared this with my HTC one and found the difference significant. Also MUCH worse than the iPhone 5.
Does anyone else have such experiences with the LG G2?
22. Ashoaib (Posts: 3229; Member since: 15 Nov 2013)
Yes, you are right... nice terminology "ghosting"... indeed it happen though I didnt realized it that time but I remember now what you mean
28. Gatorsrule52 (Posts: 85; Member since: 18 Mar 2013)
That doesn't happen with mine at all. The quality is better than an iphone 5 for sure according to the people im around, even some with iphone 5's! Ghosting can be a problem sometimes but its never more sever than the other phones ive used... i hope it can b taken care of with an update though cause i feel like this camera shouldnt have any issues with this
48. Ashoaib (Posts: 3229; Member since: 15 Nov 2013)
Yes, it is not that sever and ignorable thats why I didnt remeber it, above comment reminded me... moreover, ofcourse G2 is better then iphone 5s, no doubt in it
34. chebner (Posts: 233; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
What's causing the "ghosting" effect on moving objects is a slow shutter speed.
Have you set the ISO manually? Setting ISO to a low setting will reduce noise, but in lower light situations it will cause the camera to slow down the shutter speed in order to get adequate exposure. With a slow shutter speed moving objects will blur.
Being a photographer I don't normally recommend anyone to use full auto mode, but with these camera phones unless you are trying to capture a specific affect it's normally your best bet.
49. magnanimus (Posts: 541; Member since: 29 Mar 2013)
Thanks you. I thought no one would address this. The G2's camera didn't impress me at all :/ it does great in good lighting conditions, but try to use it at night and it becomes a potato. The viewfinder frame rate bugs me so much and if the subject is moving, they tend to 'ghost'. I wish this can be addressed by software. I really need this as I tend to take more photos at night :(
65. AndroidStuff (Posts: 45; Member since: 24 Feb 2014)
Focus was very slow on jelly bean but it was fixed on KIt Kat :) Better camera update on G2 now loving all the Pictures on HDR mode
77. sarge77 (Posts: 202; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)
The LG go has a great camera and yes movement I'd a problem kinda strange because this phone was supposed to do well with movement. The flash in any camera take forever I have note 3 and have LG g2, and same problem for both.
14. robert26101 (Posts: 107; Member since: 21 Mar 2014)
I don't crop photos so I think this phone will work for me.
18. 1ceTr0n (Posts: 549; Member since: 20 May 2012)
WTF S4 beats Note 3 in color accuracy? BS PA....
19. cai4651 (Posts: 26; Member since: 09 Mar 2014)
So...S4 is better than the new HTC one ? We are talking of a device that have 1 year old...S5 will kill this...
25. koko1 (Posts: 103; Member since: 03 Dec 2013)
thats why the s4 was the best camera phone after the 1020
so u guys said that m8 is better than s5 ?
26. Ashoaib (Posts: 3229; Member since: 15 Nov 2013)
Samsung is better bcoz sam has good experience with cameras... they are not just a phone company like many out there... sam uses the same sensor as used by others but optimize the software efficiently to out perform many... lets see how isolated cell technology will perform, it can increase sams respect or break all together
27. GoBears (Posts: 449; Member since: 27 Apr 2012)
All I can tell you is I got an LG G2 because of all these high rankings on it's camera. Let me tell you all it was one of the worst camera experiences I had on a modern smart phone. Details and colors were fine if the lighting was good and the subject was perfectly still. What these reviews always fail to mention is important details like how slow it focuses and that it doesn't use the LED to prefocus in dim lighting. I went back to the S4 and it was worlds better in quality. Now I'm super happy with my Note3 camera. My point is that you have to try them all yourself and pick the one you feel is the best.
29. Gatorsrule52 (Posts: 85; Member since: 18 Mar 2013)
Not true for me at all! Its one of the best camera phones out their! All the pictures i take come out clear and crisp and it focuses perfectly on where want it to. Im not sure what you are taking about with the LED "prefocus" because it fires the flash first, focuses, then takes a shot so everything can be crisp. The S4 camera is basically the same so I dont know why you would say "worlds better"
30. GoBears (Posts: 449; Member since: 27 Apr 2012)
Like I said, it's all in the users opinion. Mine was on 4.2.2 and definitely didn't use the flash to focus. Maybe they added that with kitkat.
32. redmd (Posts: 1268; Member since: 26 Oct 2011)
G2 camera needs tweaking. Off white balance issues but has a good amount of detail. I sold it.
33. -box- (Posts: 3991; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)
1520 below the Samsungs? I know they're pretty good (especially the Note3) but for whatever reason it's taken a beating on this round, even though there's another update already out for it which improves the camera even more than at launch.
36. Edmund (Posts: 656; Member since: 13 Jul 2012)
I really wouldn't put too much credence on a phone arena camera comparison.
61. The13thKing (banned) (Posts: 849; Member since: 26 Feb 2014)
35. Gemmol (Posts: 792; Member since: 09 Nov 2011)
This website trolls windows phone, how do you put the 1520 under any of those phones, its either they have a faulty 1520 or something, I cannot talk much about the new htc one because I do not have anyone with that phone around me, but come on, this is just trolling to a new level. I expect this out of the people who come here to comment, not the people who write the article, they shouldn't be bias at all, especially when your comparing.
50. Ashoaib (Posts: 3229; Member since: 15 Nov 2013)
Try all, visit different phone markets n try all... you will see the difference
64. The13thKing (banned) (Posts: 849; Member since: 26 Feb 2014)
Here You Go Ignorant. Read. Its Good.
37. Edmund (Posts: 656; Member since: 13 Jul 2012)
another day, another BS smartphone camera shootout by phone arena.
The 1520 wins hands down. Learn to use it properly