Camera Comparison: Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Galaxy S III, Galaxy Note II, iPhone 5, Nokia 808 PureView
0. phoneArena posted on 28 Jan 2013, 08:19
Over the years we've done our fair share of cameraphone comparisons, but the one we have for you today is unlike any other. That's because among the contestants we have a real, dedicated point-and-shoot camera – the Android-powered Samsung Galaxy Camera, which will be competing against some of the most capable handsets currently on the market...
This is a discussion for a review. To read the whole review, click here
120. iguano posted on 02 Feb 2013, 07:27 1 1
because their are cheap
83. Guarulhos posted on 28 Jan 2013, 22:02 1 2
Nokia 808 PureView PRO (_____ABYSS_____) All The Other Phones With Integrated Camera !!!
48. deadhead posted on 28 Jan 2013, 17:36 2 0
The 808 is better... as soon as you look at an image from the galaxy and one from the 808, it pretty obvious. And when you consider the size difference, and the added functionality the 808 gives you.. no contest.
Don't forget the HAAC microphones on the 808... it will produce a much better audio/video recording as well.
50. Guarulhos posted on 28 Jan 2013, 17:45 2 0
Nokia 808 PureView PRO Is Infinitely Superior To Any Mobile Phone, Regardless Of Scene And Lighting !
When Comparing The Same 808 PureView PRO With The Galaxy Camera, The Picture Does Not Change, 808 PureView PRO Has a Quality Photographic And Video Much Better !
P.S: No Doubt This Is Incomplete And Review More Ridiculous Already Done For PhoneArena !
52. jiezel91 posted on 28 Jan 2013, 17:53 3 0
After reading several "camera shootout" type of reviews conducted by Phonearena, I can only come to one conclusion: THEY KNOW NOTHING ABOUT PHOTOGRAPHY.
53. ahhxd717 posted on 28 Jan 2013, 18:05 3 0
I don't understand why they rarely include the Lumia 920 on these camera comparisons. Its known to have an excellent camera, yet is not included while both the Note 2 and S3 are on the list (I assume they have comparable camera modules). Wtf? Im sure one perk the Lukia has is the camera, so I'd think people would like to know how it fares. They could have included the One X+/DNA as well. Always Apple/Samsung.
54. fahqman posted on 28 Jan 2013, 18:13 1 10
808 Purview just got embarrassed by 8 mp smartphone cameras. I guess the 41 mp sensor with full resolution of 34~38 mp on a 1/1.2" sensor is really meaningless when the colors are this bad. I love my note 2 but the iphone's picture quality seems to be the best. I feel like phonearena just got exposed, too for choosing the 808 Purview for best innovation in 2012. All of these phones were out in 2012.
1. iphone 5
5. 808 PURVIEW
55. chaoticrazor posted on 28 Jan 2013, 18:18 7 2
shows you no nothing
everyone on here who aren biased have said the 808 clearly won, and the galaxy camera gave a poor performance. you just jump in and blindly follow instead of actually looking at the photo's
as for the colours, its called natural i.e. no post processing. the samsung lot and iphone all add post processing to gloss up the photo's. if you want over saturated colours on the 808 just use vivid and increase saturation
so go educate yourself before running your mouth please
57. fahqman posted on 28 Jan 2013, 18:55 1 7
OH, I'M SORRY PURVIEW POLICE!! BUT WHY ARE YOU SO MAD AND SO HATEFUL??
"everyone on here who aren't biased have said the 808 clearly won,"
Do you mean you and your other eight laptops and nokia smartphones?? LOL!!
You should really get rid of the sunglasses on your avatar and maybe then you'll see better lol.
808's picture quality is like watching dark scenes on a s**tty lcd panel.
Go enjoy your gray 'natural' pics lol.
Hey, you gotta new message on your laptop #4.
86. MC1123 posted on 28 Jan 2013, 22:22 4 1
go educate yourself!
808 pureview CAN shot 3MP, 5MP and 8MP pictures!!!
92. Anamela233 posted on 28 Jan 2013, 22:56 2 3
even at those low res, 808 pictures still look unnaturally washed up with gray tint.
108. MistyFog posted on 29 Jan 2013, 08:08 2 0
Not just PhoneArea. Try DPReview. And many other review sites. The 808 has been stacked against high-end DSLRs, micro four thirds, high end point and shoots, and other smartphones. Go through all the reviews before you embarrass yourself further.
For those who actually know something about photography, white balance and saturation are something that can be fixed in post-processing. You can easily see that the 808's photos are generally left untouched which may initially look inferior to the uninitiated but the other phone's images have been heavily processed and the noise level can be quite bad especially under poor lighting condition.
59. d.scythe posted on 28 Jan 2013, 19:48 6 4
i think 808 clearly the winner here...
even at night pics...
it shows more details than others...
plus it doesn't produce much noise than others...
for all android fanboy, sorry, but the galaxies SUCKS...
even for it's camera...
*i'm not an 808 owner by the way...
i'm using iphone 4s and i'm quite pleased with it pics...
but i'm amazed by what 808 can do...
still wait for lumia + pureview + OIS in one phone...
70. cripton805 posted on 28 Jan 2013, 20:42 0 4
It sucks compared? You gotta be kidding. They all excell in different areas.
You make it seem like its a huuuuuuuge difference.
Like if it was a no contest. They all take great pictures.
72. d.scythe posted on 28 Jan 2013, 21:04 3 1
if compared to 808, i think it is...
the galaxies show to much noise even in daylight (when zoomed)...
CMIIW, but i really think so...
77. MC1123 posted on 28 Jan 2013, 21:52 3 2
lol stop being an android fanboy! everybody can see that galaxy phones and samsung camera products (handy cam and camera phone and other with camera) SUCKS BIGTIME!!!!
so dont hate iPhone that it got the 2nd spot if you hate apple... coz honestly its not apple's own sensor, its sony! so if they put on xperia s/t or the new xperia z there, it will sure come in second place!
come to your real sense and stop being a fanboy! watch the real thing!
s3 might be a powerful android phone but in terms in camera department, it just sucks!
87. d.scythe posted on 28 Jan 2013, 22:23 0 0
whoa... take it easy dude...
i don't hate the galaxies, but just sayin the fact i saw that their cams are not good enough...
maybe that because the cheap thing or what i don't know...
but the galaxy camera i think really sucks cause it suppose to be made for camera right? how come it get beaten by phone cams...
the only plus the gal cam is that it has optical zoom...
99. cripton805 posted on 29 Jan 2013, 00:50 0 2
I don't hate Apple or any company. You need to slap yourself into reality brother. Do yourself a favor.
71. a_tumiwa posted on 28 Jan 2013, 21:01 1 0
if rank 1 = 2 point , rank 2 = 1 point, so the total point for each device:
- Nokia 808: 2+1+1+1+2+2+1 = 10
- iphone 5: 1+1+1+1+1+1+1 = 7
- Samsung Galaxy S III: 2+1+1+2+1+1 = 8
- SG Camera: 2+2+2+1+1+2 = 10
- Samsung Galaxy Note 2: 1+1+2+1+1 = 6
so Nokia 808 and SG Camera are tie @rank 1
if we exclude Feature and Easy to Use part, then the winner is Nokia 808
Top 3 are: Nokia 808, SG Camera, Samsung Galaxy S III
74. MC1123 posted on 28 Jan 2013, 21:45 1 5
YOU ARE DREAMING!!!
nokia 808 is sure number 1 but lol at samsung galaxy camera and s3 on runner up and you didnt include iPhone!
dont kid your self droidy! stop being immature hater! samsung camera and its camera phone are PATHETIC!!!
iPhone's sensor is good coz it uses sony's sensor!! so its not Apple its sony's!!!!
stop being a hater and face reality!!! SAMSUNG SUCKS ON DESIGNS, BUILD QUALITY and CAMERA!!!!
100. cripton805 posted on 29 Jan 2013, 00:53 0 1
The processor is not Nokias... "rolls eyes with sarcasm"
So its not Nokia.
75. Guarulhos posted on 28 Jan 2013, 21:46 0 0
Nokia 808 PureView PRO (_____ABYSS_____) All The Other Phones With Integrated Camera !!!
84. Guarulhos posted on 28 Jan 2013, 22:06 1 0
PhoneArena... THEY KNOW NOTHING ABOUT PHOTOGRAPHY !!!
88. Anamela233 posted on 28 Jan 2013, 22:31 1 3
You can sense the desperation in the air when fanboys are working overtime to meaninglessly defend their product.
808 preview is nothing but a smartphone with a overly hyped camera. That's why I didn't spend my money on it just like the rest of the world didn't either.
90. Anamela233 posted on 28 Jan 2013, 22:47 0 0
I'm able to tell how well Samsung is doing by counting the number of Samsung haters.
They're all so mad at Samsung like Samsung stole their lunch money lol.
iphone 4s has been really good to me but I can't wait for the GS4 to come out.
93. Guarulhos posted on 28 Jan 2013, 23:12 0 0
YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT PHOTOGRAPHY !!!
P.S: Nokia 808 PureView PRO (_____ABYSS_____) All The Other Phones With Integrated Camera !!!
105. JosDes posted on 29 Jan 2013, 02:07 0 0
I wouldn't buy a galaxy camera for such few improvements over a good phone like a note II and the price tag is also quite high
107. JosDes posted on 29 Jan 2013, 02:13 0 0
I wouldn't buy a galaxy camera as it just provides minor improvements over phones such as the note II or galaxy sIII + it also costs quite a bit of money
117. -RVM- posted on 29 Jan 2013, 15:09 1 0
Last month i had a chance to compare my 808 with friend's iPhone 4S. We tried indoor low-light shots without flash. Both phones were attached to tripod with special tripod mount. I told my friend to use any settings he wants on his iPhone, so he tried it once without HDR and once with HDR. We found out that HDR shot was better, with less noise. On Nokia 808 i used manual settings and lowered ISO value to 50.
These are 100% crops (808 was used in 8MP mode):
As you can see, the difference is HUGE! Then i tried auto settings shot on my 808 and the difference was still huge, but shot was a bit noisier because of higher ISO 500.
118. -RVM- posted on 29 Jan 2013, 15:09 0 0
Of course, iPhone 5 takes better shots than iPhone 4S, but i didn't have it to use for comparision. Anyway, i don't think the results would be much different.
119. IgorEfremenko posted on 29 Jan 2013, 16:00 1 0
Bring damn PureView Phase 1 camera to windows phone and I will switch do this platform damn it!
122. phone_user posted on 07 Feb 2013, 23:26 0 0
i will have to agree with the majority here in the call that the 808 takes better pictures but the issue with nokia's approach was a little wrong. most casual users want vivid punchy colors instead of fine detail and wide dynamic range. while the 808 can be set to do it, it doesn't by default. the 808 shoots pretty much how a seasoned photographer would want. grayish as most people here are calling it. the greyish soft color actually has more information in it for post work then punchy color with blown out highs and black of the lows. a great example would be the gopros pro-tune recording mode. the 808 isnt a phone i would use everyday because of its OS (i loved symbian in the days it was on top) so i only use mine on vacation. its the camera phone you want when it comes to using navigation when internet is expensive over seas (best offline maping period) and when you want to know that you always get the shot you want (it hasnt missed a photo op yet). i will say i had high hopes for the galaxy camera, it would have been my 808 replacement.
123. BitterTruth (unregistered) posted on 11 Feb 2013, 01:57 0 0
Dont try to challenge Nokia when it comes to camera!
Only the Sony has the ability to challenge Nokia.
Nokia is the clear winner for now!
I personally like Samsung phones regarding their updates and especially battery life but the camera looks a bit fail.