Apple iPhone 4S vs Motorola DROID BIONIC vs Samsung Galaxy S II T-Mobile
0. phoneArena 27 Oct 2011, 09:44 posted on
All launched relatively close to one another, the Motorola DROID BIONIC, Samsung Galaxy S II for T-Mobile, and Apple iPhone 4S are all vying for supremacy in being proclaimed as the best of the best. We’ve all waited long enough this year to finally see these quality smartphones, so which one will ultimately outgun the rest in finding itself home in your hands?...
This is a discussion for a review. To read the whole review, click here
125. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5704; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)
you know the Droid Bionic was actually the winner right?
121. c.hack (Posts: 600; Member since: 09 Dec 2009)
If this is a comparison for Verizon, the Samsung should be a Nexus. If its not a Verizon comparison, then don't include the Bionic.
This is a very poor comparison. The only people that would be comparing these phones are those that are looking for a new carrier.
I love my iPhone 4s after using Droids for 2 years, but only wish the screen was bigger. However, the camera is a breath of fresh air after suffering with Motorola Droid cameras. And I was surprised how well the multitasking works on the 4S - its as good as on my DX2.
126. dmn666 (Posts: 244; Member since: 19 Oct 2011)
Aight, PA. I'd get Bionic to replace my second phone. RAZR would be my primary device though:P
I wish I could get an android phone with Nokia call quality, SE music and camera, SE/Apple design, Nokia/Moto build, 720p Sharp display and LTE in one complete package.
132. JayEss (Posts: 1; Member since: 16 Nov 2011)
Wow, this guy is such an apple fanboy. The 4S video is clearly noisy and lacking sharpness. The SGS2 video is just more accurate. He gives the 4S a pass on everything and downplays it weaknesses. When will these fanboys realize they're just victims of a really good marketing campaign?