Alcatel One Touch Fire Review
With the so far disastrous showing from the Alcatel One Touch Fire, we were half-expecting another crisis with call quality. Luckily, this time around we were proven wrong – call quality is definitely above average for its class, the speaker is loud and clear and people were able to hear us fine even with significant noise in the background.
The 1400mAh cell on the Alcatel One Touch Fire, coupled with the low-resolution screen and crippled chipset means that the phone's battery life is actually one of its strongest points. It can easily get through a day of usage, even two if you're conservative.
In conclusion, we've got to say that the Alcatel One Touch left us truly polarized, confused and, frankly, frustrated on a number of things.
On one hand, we acknowledge the fact that this is a budget device through and through, and lousy hardware is to be expected. On the other hand, however, we can't pretend to be oblivious to the fact that this device probably shouldn't have made the internal cut to start with.
Then, there's Firefox OS. We're plenty excited about the prospect of more diversity, we really are. Unfortunately, even when accounting for the part that the low-end hardware played, we've got to say that the OS has a long, long way to go. This means that while the underlying functionality is mostly stable and working, Mozilla is many miles away from offering the user experience that its rivals do. What's even more, while we understand that Mozilla needs to start somewhere, we've got to question whether it was the wisest decision to go with such a decidedly low-end device that simply magnifies the OS' weaknesses and only serves to push the odd early adopter away.
- Very affordable
- Call quality is above average
- Battery can last two days
- Extremely slow
- Buggy and unresponsive apps
- Camera is below average for its class
- Low-resolution screen
- Poor app ecosystem
- Web browsing is frustrating
1. Felix_Gatto (Posts: 496; Member since: 03 Jul 2013)
For an entry level smartphone, it deserves more than 3 points.
Really dissapointed that PA mostly give bad score to entry level smartphones and feature phones. PA should give the score accordingly to the phone class/level.
3. jellmoo (Posts: 690; Member since: 31 Oct 2011)
I agree that a 3 is a little low, but if the bugs mentioned here are as prevalent and serious as they say, that alone is a very good reason to have a low score.
Also consider how a device like this, while similarly priced, is of considerably less value than the budget friendly Lumia 520.
6. PhoneArena Team (Posts: 238; Member since: 27 Jun 2006)
We rate each device based on its class. We recently reviewed the very budget Acer Liquid Z3 and it scored 7.9/10.
8. Felix_Gatto (Posts: 496; Member since: 03 Jul 2013)
Thank you for the answer.
I really appreciate it.
4. PapaSmurf (Posts: 8614; Member since: 14 May 2012)
Wait, isn't this being compared to devices within the same price point?
5. sprockkets (Posts: 1236; Member since: 16 Jan 2012)
"PhoneArena.com takes over a minute to fully render, not to mention that it crashes every now and then after loading for a while. "
Uh, that's not a shocker - it does the same thing with my HTC Sensation, and that thing is what, 2 generations newer of a CPU?
Your site sucks for mobile devices.
7. buccob (Posts: 1481; Member since: 19 Jun 2012)
Actually I think it is a known problem using Opera with Turbo (or Off Road) mode ON... IF by any chance that is your case...
I do not have problems with PA over Chrome, Puffin or WEBmall Browser for Sony's Small Apps
11. chamucost20 (Posts: 2; Member since: 23 Feb 2014)
Actually, the site takes quite some time to load even on Chrome on a Huawei Y320 which is no slouch... funny how a site dedicated to mobile devices doesn't work so well on mobile devices. I have been using the One Touch Fire for a couple of months now and though it still has some bugs (like not being able to establish a data connection after turning Airplane Mode on and off), it's nothing close to the horror story PhoneArena is telling, and there's just no way the phone deserves a 3/10 -.-
9. DanielWalsh1294 (Posts: 18; Member since: 08 Oct 2013)
What is the effing point of this phone and OS. They are both @#$5.
10. SebasCvdB (Posts: 3; Member since: 18 Feb 2012)
The specs on this phone is horrible even for a low budget phone. You think Alcatel could do better at this point. Also I smell lawsuit if Apple would see this thing. I feel like I've been trasported back to 2007 / 2008 looking at this thing.
12. chamucost20 (Posts: 2; Member since: 23 Feb 2014)
Which wouldn't be a surprise, they would even sue an apple tree for "infringing on their trademark" xD
|Display||3.5 inches, 320 x 480 pixels (165 ppi) TFT|
Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227A, Single core, 1000 MHz, ARM Cortex-A5 processor
256 MB RAM
|Size||4.53 x 2.45 x 0.48 inches|
(115 x 62.3 x 12.2 mm)
3.81 oz (108 g)
|Battery||1400 mAh, 6.7 hours talk time|