i-mate Ultimate 9502 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to i-mate Ultimate 9502 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how i-mate Ultimate 9502 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
i-mate Ultimate 9502 vs Apple iPhone 3GS
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (400 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
i-mate Ultimate 9502-specific Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (286 ppi)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
i-mate Ultimate 9502 vs Samsung GALAXY Tab 7.0 Plus
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
i-mate Ultimate 9502-specific Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (286 ppi)
- Slow processor (400 MHz)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
i-mate Ultimate 9502 vs HTC Blue Angel
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (400 MHz)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
i-mate Ultimate 9502 vs HTC Prophet
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (400 MHz vs 200 MHz)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches vs 0.71 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
i-mate Ultimate 9502 vs HTC Touch Pro2
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (286 ppi vs 259 ppi)
- Slow processor (400 MHz vs 528 MHz)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches vs 0.68 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 288 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
i-mate Ultimate 9502-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment





