i-mate Ultimate 9150 Rivals and Competitors

Rivals

Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to i-mate Ultimate 9150 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how i-mate Ultimate 9150 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.

i-mate Ultimate 9150 vs mobiado 105GCB

i-mate Ultimate 9150 VS. mobiado 105GCB
Compare them to see their detailed specs side by side.

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS, HSDPA 1.8 Mbit/s vs EDGE, UMTS)
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

i-mate Ultimate 9150-specific Pros & Cons

  • Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (308 ppi)
  • Slow processor (520 MHz)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

mobiado 105GCB-specific Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.30 x 1.87 x 0.42 inches)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

i-mate Ultimate 9150 vs Philips Xenium X810

i-mate Ultimate 9150 VS. Philips Xenium X810
Compare them to see their detailed specs side by side.

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

i-mate Ultimate 9150-specific Pros & Cons

  • Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (308 ppi)
  • Slow processor (520 MHz)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS, HSDPA 1.8 Mbit/s)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches)
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

Philips Xenium X810-specific Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.07 x 1.66 x 0.53 inches)
  • Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

All content (phone reviews, news, specs, info), design and layouts are Copyright 2001-2012 phoneArena.com. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part or in any form or medium without written permission is prohibited!
Privacy | Terms of use