x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

i-mate Ultimate 8502 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

i-mate Ultimate 8502 i-mate Ultimate 8502


  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

i-mate Ultimate 9502 i-mate Ultimate 9502


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

in-depth comparison



i-mate Ultimate 8502 i-mate Ultimate 8502


  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • No front-facing camera

i-mate Ultimate 7150 i-mate Ultimate 7150


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS, HSDPA 1.8 Mbit/s)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi vs 211 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

in-depth comparison



i-mate Ultimate 8502 i-mate Ultimate 8502


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

HTC Touch Cruise HTC Touch Cruise


  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi vs 143 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

in-depth comparison



i-mate Ultimate 8502 i-mate Ultimate 8502


  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)

i-mate 810-F i-mate 810-F


  • Water-resistant phone
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi vs 163 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



i-mate Ultimate 8502 i-mate Ultimate 8502


  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera

Jolla Smartphone Jolla Smartphone


  • High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
  • Dual core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



i-mate Ultimate 8502 i-mate Ultimate 8502


  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera

Sony Xperia Z2a Sony Xperia Z2a


  • Big display (5.0 inches)
  • High-resolution display (1080 x 1920 pixels)
  • Extremely high pixel density screen, over 370ppi (441 ppi)
  • High-resolution camera (20.7 megapixels)
  • Quad core processor
  • Lots of RAM (3072 MB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • NFC
  • Water-resistant phone
  • Battery is not user replaceable

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



i-mate Ultimate 8502 i-mate Ultimate 8502


  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • No front-facing camera

i-mate Ultimate 8150 i-mate Ultimate 8150


  • High pixel densitiy screen, over 300ppi (308 ppi)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS, HSDPA 1.8 Mbit/s)
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories