i-mate Ultimate 8502 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
i-mate Ultimate 8502 vs. i-mate Ultimate 9502
i-mate Ultimate 8502
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- No front-facing camera
i-mate Ultimate 9502
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (286 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (400 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
in-depth comparison
i-mate Ultimate 8502 vs. Sony Ericsson K750
i-mate Ultimate 8502
- Slow processor (400 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Sony Ericsson K750
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.80 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
i-mate Ultimate 8502 vs. Nokia 1200
i-mate Ultimate 8502
- Slow processor (400 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Nokia 1200
- No rear camera
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an e-mail client
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
i-mate Ultimate 8502 vs. HTC One X
i-mate Ultimate 8502
- Slow processor (400 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
HTC One X
- Quad core processor
- Very big display (4.7 inches)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (312 ppi)
- High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1500 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
-
1.
What makes the Full HD IPS display on the LG Optimus G Pro better than AMOLED
-
2.
The forbidden fruit: here are 7 great Android apps that Google does not allow on Play store
-
3.
All from Google I/O 2013
-
4.
Samsung officials confirm 5.9-inch Note III will come at IFA in September, Galaxy S4 to hit 10 million sales next week
