x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

i-mate Ultimate 8502 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

i-mate Ultimate 8502 i-mate Ultimate 8502


  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

HTC X7500 Advantage HTC X7500 Advantage


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS, HSDPA 1.8 Mbit/s)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

in-depth comparison



i-mate Ultimate 8502 i-mate Ultimate 8502


  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

i-mate Ultimate 9502 i-mate Ultimate 9502


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 480 x 640 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

in-depth comparison



i-mate Ultimate 8502 i-mate Ultimate 8502


  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera

Sony Xperia Z2a Sony Xperia Z2a


  • Big display (5.0 inches)
  • High-resolution display (1080 x 1920 pixels)
  • Extremely high pixel density screen, over 430ppi (441 ppi)
  • High-resolution camera (20.7 megapixels)
  • Quad core processor
  • Lots of RAM (3072 MB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
  • Water-resistant phone
  • Battery is not user replaceable

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



i-mate Ultimate 8502 i-mate Ultimate 8502


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

HTC TyTN II HTC TyTN II


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches inches)
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi vs 143 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

in-depth comparison



i-mate Ultimate 8502 i-mate Ultimate 8502


  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

Eten X900 Eten X900


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 480 x 640 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

in-depth comparison



i-mate Ultimate 8502 i-mate Ultimate 8502


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

HTC Touch HD HTC Touch HD


  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi vs 246 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 288 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

in-depth comparison



i-mate Ultimate 8502 i-mate Ultimate 8502


  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera

HTC One M9+ HTC One M9+


  • Big display (5.2 inches)
  • High-resolution display (1440 x 2560 pixels)
  • Extremely high pixel density screen, over 430ppi (565 ppi)
  • High-resolution camera (20 megapixels)
  • 8-core processor
  • Lots of RAM (3072 MB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
  • Battery is not user replaceable

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories