i-mate K-JAR Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
i-mate K-JAR vs. Acer beTouch E140
i-mate K-JAR
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (200 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
i-mate K-JAR vs. Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.7
i-mate K-JAR
- Slow processor (200 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.7
- Dual core processor
- Very fast processor (1400 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
i-mate K-JAR vs. Nokia E90 Communicator
i-mate K-JAR
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (200 MHz vs 332 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches vs 0.78 inches inches)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
i-mate K-JAR vs. i-mate Ultimate 7150
i-mate K-JAR
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (200 MHz vs 520 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches vs 0.70 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
i-mate K-JAR vs. Samsung Galaxy Ace
i-mate K-JAR
- Slow processor (200 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 165 ppi)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
i-mate K-JAR vs. Motorola DEFY PRO
i-mate K-JAR
- Slow processor (200 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
i-mate K-JAR vs. LG KG320
i-mate K-JAR
- Slow processor (200 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
LG KG320
- Small dimensions (3.74 x 1.77 x 0.38 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an e-mail client
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
More Rivals
