i-mate K-JAR Rivals and Competitors

Rivals

Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to i-mate K-JAR the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how i-mate K-JAR compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.

i-mate K-JAR vs LG PRADA II

i-mate K-JAR VS. LG PRADA II
Compare them to see their detailed specs side by side.

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 155 ppi)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches vs 0.66 inches)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

i-mate K-JAR-specific Pros & Cons

  • Slow processor (200 MHz)
  • Bulky
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

LG PRADA II-specific Pros & Cons

none

i-mate K-JAR vs Samsung Galaxy

i-mate K-JAR VS. Samsung Galaxy
Compare them to see their detailed specs side by side.

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

i-mate K-JAR-specific Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
  • Slow processor (200 MHz)
  • Bulky
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack

Samsung Galaxy-specific Pros & Cons

none

i-mate K-JAR vs Samsung Jet

i-mate K-JAR VS. Samsung Jet
Compare them to see their detailed specs side by side.

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

i-mate K-JAR-specific Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
  • Slow processor (200 MHz)
  • Bulky
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Samsung Jet-specific Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.29 x 2.11 x 0.47 inches)
  • Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (301 ppi)

i-mate K-JAR vs LG C710

i-mate K-JAR VS. LG C710
Compare them to see their detailed specs side by side.

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow processor (200 MHz vs 600 MHz)
  • Bulky
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

i-mate K-JAR-specific Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack

LG C710-specific Pros & Cons

  • High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (292 ppi)
  • Low-resolution video capture

All content (phone reviews, news, specs, info), design and layouts are Copyright 2001-2012 phoneArena.com. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part or in any form or medium without written permission is prohibited!
Privacy | Terms of use