i-mate K-JAR Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to i-mate K-JAR the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how i-mate K-JAR compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
i-mate K-JAR vs LG PRADA II
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 155 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches vs 0.66 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
i-mate K-JAR-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (200 MHz)
- Bulky
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
LG PRADA II-specific Pros & Cons
none
i-mate K-JAR vs Samsung Galaxy
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
i-mate K-JAR-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Slow processor (200 MHz)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Galaxy-specific Pros & Cons
none
i-mate K-JAR vs Samsung Jet
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
i-mate K-JAR-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Slow processor (200 MHz)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Samsung Jet-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 2.11 x 0.47 inches)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (301 ppi)
i-mate K-JAR vs LG C710
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (200 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Bulky
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
i-mate K-JAR-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
LG C710-specific Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (292 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
