i-mate JAQ3 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
i-mate JAQ3 vs. HTC Ozone
i-mate JAQ3
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, EV-DO Rev.A)
- Slow processor (200 MHz vs 528 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (160 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 192 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
i-mate JAQ3 vs. HTC Touch Cruise
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (200 MHz vs 528 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (160 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison

