i-mate 810-F Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
i-mate 810-F vs. Verykool R620
i-mate 810-F
- Slow processor (624 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (163 ppi vs 174 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
i-mate 810-F vs. Verykool R23
i-mate 810-F
- Slow processor (624 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (163 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
i-mate 810-F vs. HTC TyTN II
i-mate 810-F
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- No front-facing camera
HTC TyTN II
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (624 MHz vs 400 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (163 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
in-depth comparison
i-mate 810-F vs. HP iPAQ Glisten
i-mate 810-F
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (624 MHz vs 533 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (163 ppi vs 160 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
i-mate 810-F vs. Samsung Rugby Smart
i-mate 810-F
- Slow processor (624 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (163 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Samsung Rugby Smart
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (252 ppi)
- Very fast processor (1400 MHz)
- Water-resistant phone
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison

