i-mate 810-F Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to i-mate 810-F the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how i-mate 810-F compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
i-mate 810-F vs Motorola ES400
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (624 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Bulky
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
i-mate 810-F-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (163 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Motorola ES400-specific Pros & Cons
- Dual-mode CDMA/GSM phone
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (267 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches)
i-mate 810-F vs HTC TyTN II
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (163 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- Slow processor (624 MHz vs 400 MHz)
- Bulky
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
i-mate 810-F-specific Pros & Cons
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
HTC TyTN II-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
i-mate 810-F vs Samsung Galaxy Xcover
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (163 ppi vs 158 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
i-mate 810-F-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (624 MHz)
- Bulky
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Samsung Galaxy Xcover-specific Pros & Cons
- Water-resistant phone
- Low-resolution video capture
i-mate 810-F vs Samsung GALAXY Nexus CDMA
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
i-mate 810-F-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (163 ppi)
- Slow processor (624 MHz)
- Bulky
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Samsung GALAXY Nexus CDMA-specific Pros & Cons
- Dual core processor
- Thin body, measuring less than 9.5mm/0.37inches (0.37 inches)
- Very big display (4.65 inches)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (316 ppi)
- High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
- Very fast processor (1200 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
i-mate 810-F vs HTC Bresson
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
i-mate 810-F-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (163 ppi)
- Slow processor (624 MHz)
- Bulky
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
HTC Bresson-specific Pros & Cons
- High-resolution camera (16 megapixels)
i-mate 810-F vs Samsung Epix
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (163 ppi vs 177 ppi)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 150 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
i-mate 810-F-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (624 MHz)
- Bulky
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Samsung Epix-specific Pros & Cons
none
i-mate 810-F vs Kogan Agora Pro
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (163 ppi vs 160 ppi)
- Bulky
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
i-mate 810-F-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (624 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Kogan Agora Pro-specific Pros & Cons
none
