PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

i-mate 810-F Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

i-mate 810-F i-mate 810-F


  • Slow processor (624 MHz)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera

Verykool R620 Verykool R620


  • Splash-proof phone
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (163 ppi vs 174 ppi)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



i-mate 810-F i-mate 810-F


  • Slow processor (624 MHz)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (163 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera

Verykool R23 Verykool R23


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Lacks an e-mail client

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



i-mate 810-F i-mate 810-F


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • No front-facing camera

HTC TyTN II HTC TyTN II


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches inches)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow processor (624 MHz vs 400 MHz)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (163 ppi vs 143 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

in-depth comparison



i-mate 810-F i-mate 810-F


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow processor (624 MHz vs 533 MHz)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (163 ppi vs 160 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



i-mate 810-F i-mate 810-F


  • Slow processor (624 MHz)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (163 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera

Samsung Rugby Smart Samsung Rugby Smart


  • High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (252 ppi)
  • Very fast processor (1400 MHz)
  • Water-resistant phone

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Hot Phones

  • Samsung Galaxy S4Samsung Galaxy S4
  • Apple iPhone 5Apple iPhone 5
  • Samsung GALAXY Note IISamsung GALAXY Note II
  • HTC OneHTC One
  • Sony Xperia ZSony Xperia Z
  • Google Nexus 4Google Nexus 4
  • LG Optimus GLG Optimus G
  • Nokia Lumia 920Nokia Lumia 920