ZTE V81 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
ZTE V81 vs. ZTE V98
ZTE V81
- HDMI connector for TV-out ()
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual core processor
- Very fast processor (1400 MHz vs 1800 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM vs 2048 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (160 ppi vs 157 ppi)
in-depth comparison
ZTE V81 vs. BlackBerry Q10
ZTE V81
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (160 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
BlackBerry Q10
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (330 ppi)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- NFC
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual core processor
- Very fast processor (1400 MHz vs 1500 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM vs 2048 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- HDMI connector for TV-out ()
in-depth comparison
ZTE V81 vs. Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0
ZTE V81
- Dual core processor
- HDMI connector for TV-out ()
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (160 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Very fast processor (1400 MHz vs 1600 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM vs 2048 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- The camera lacks flash
in-depth comparison
ZTE V81 vs. Karbonn A9+
ZTE V81
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- HDMI connector for TV-out ()
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (160 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Karbonn A9+
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE, GPRS)
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual core processor
- Very fast processor (1400 MHz vs 1200 MHz)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
ZTE V81 vs. ARCHOS 80 Cobalt
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual core processor
- Very fast processor (1400 MHz vs 1600 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (160 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
ZTE V81 vs. ZTE PF 100
ZTE PF 100
- Quad core processor
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (HSDPA+ (4G) 28 Mbit/s, HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Very fast processor (1400 MHz vs 1500 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- HDMI connector for TV-out ()
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (160 ppi vs 149 ppi)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
ZTE V81 vs. BlackBerry Z10
ZTE V81
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (160 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
BlackBerry Z10
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (356 ppi)
- High-resolution display (768 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- NFC
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual core processor
- Very fast processor (1400 MHz vs 1500 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM vs 2048 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- HDMI connector for TV-out ()
in-depth comparison
