ZTE Score M Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
ZTE Score M vs. Samsung Admire
ZTE Score M
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (165 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
ZTE Score M vs. LG Motion 4G
ZTE Score M
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
LG Motion 4G
- Dual core processor
- Very fast processor (1200 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (165 ppi)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
ZTE Score M vs. Coolpad Quattro 4G
ZTE Score M
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (165 ppi)
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
in-depth comparison
ZTE Score M vs. LG Optimus M+
ZTE Score M
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (165 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
ZTE Score M vs. Samsung Galaxy Admire 4G
ZTE Score M
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (165 ppi vs 158 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
in-depth comparison
ZTE Score M vs. LG Connect 4G
ZTE Score M
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (165 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
LG Connect 4G
- Dual core processor
- Very fast processor (1200 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
ZTE Score M vs. ZTE Avid 4G
ZTE Score M
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (165 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
ZTE Avid 4G
- Dual core processor
- Very fast processor (1200 MHz)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- The camera lacks autofocus
in-depth comparison
