x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

ZTE Coral200 Sollar Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

ZTE Coral200 Sollar ZTE Coral200 Sollar


  • No rear camera
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.71 inches inches)
  • Lacks an e-mail client
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Motorola Moto E Motorola Moto E


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Splash-proof phone
  • Low pixel density screen (256 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM)
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



ZTE Coral200 Sollar ZTE Coral200 Sollar


  • No rear camera
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.71 inches inches)
  • Lacks an e-mail client

ZTE Raise ZTE Raise


  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



ZTE Coral200 Sollar ZTE Coral200 Sollar


  • No rear camera
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.71 inches inches)
  • Lacks an e-mail client
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

LG G2 LG G2


  • Big display (5.2 inches)
  • High-resolution display (1080 x 1920 pixels)
  • High pixel densitiy screen (423 ppi)
  • High screen-to-body ratio (76.28 %)
  • Quad core processor
  • Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
  • Battery is not user replaceable

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

in-depth comparison



ZTE Coral200 Sollar ZTE Coral200 Sollar


  • No rear camera
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.71 inches inches)
  • Lacks an e-mail client
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

LG Optimus L5 LG Optimus L5


  • Low pixel density screen (144 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



ZTE Coral200 Sollar ZTE Coral200 Sollar


  • No rear camera
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.71 inches inches)
  • Lacks an e-mail client
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Huawei Ascend G620S Huawei Ascend G620S


  • Big display (5.0 inches)
  • High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
  • Quad core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM)
  • Battery is not user replaceable

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



ZTE Coral200 Sollar ZTE Coral200 Sollar


  • No rear camera
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Spice Mobile M-5335 WOW Spice Mobile M-5335 WOW


  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (141 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.71 inches inches vs 0.74 inches inches)
  • Lacks an e-mail client
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



ZTE Coral200 Sollar ZTE Coral200 Sollar


  • No rear camera
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.71 inches inches)
  • Lacks an e-mail client

Philips Xenium X503 Philips Xenium X503


  • Dual SIM card support
  • Small dimensions (4.51 x 1.95 x 0.43 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories