x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

ZTE Blade III ZTE Blade III


  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (233 ppi vs 267 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



ZTE Blade III ZTE Blade III


  • Single-core processor
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (233 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



ZTE Blade III ZTE Blade III


  • Single-core processor
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

ZTE Blade Q Mini ZTE Blade Q Mini


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Small dimensions (4.94 x 2.52 x 0.35 inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (233 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM vs 1000 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Sony Xperia E Sony Xperia E


  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (233 ppi vs 165 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels vs 320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



ZTE Blade III ZTE Blade III


  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (233 ppi vs 267 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



ZTE Blade III ZTE Blade III


  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Motorola Moto E Motorola Moto E


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Splash-proof phone
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • The camera lacks autofocus

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (233 ppi vs 256 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



ZTE Blade III ZTE Blade III


  • Low pixel density screen (233 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

Motorola Moto G Motorola Moto G


  • High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
  • High pixel densitiy screen (329 ppi)
  • Quad core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories