ZTE Blade C Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
ZTE Blade C vs. ZTE Grand S
ZTE Blade C
- Dual core processor
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
ZTE Grand S
- Quad core processor
- Very big display (5.0 inches)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (441 ppi)
- High-resolution display (1080 x 1920 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (13 megapixels)
- Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- Small dimensions (5.59 x 2.72 x 0.27 inches inches)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Fast processor (1000 MHz vs 1700 MHz)
in-depth comparison
ZTE Blade C vs. ZTE Blade
ZTE Blade C
- Dual core processor
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
ZTE Blade C vs. Sony Xperia tipo
ZTE Blade C
- Dual core processor
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Sony Xperia tipo
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
ZTE Blade C vs. ZTE Blade III
ZTE Blade C
- Dual core processor
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
ZTE Blade C vs. HTC One
ZTE Blade C
- Dual core processor
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
HTC One
- Quad core processor
- Very big display (4.7 inches)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (468 ppi)
- High-resolution display (1080 x 1920 pixels)
- Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Fast processor (1000 MHz vs 1700 MHz)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
in-depth comparison
ZTE Blade C vs. T-Mobile Aspect
ZTE Blade C
- Dual core processor
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
T-Mobile Aspect
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
in-depth comparison
ZTE Blade C vs. BlackBerry Z10
ZTE Blade C
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
BlackBerry Z10
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (356 ppi)
- High-resolution display (768 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Micro HDMI (Type D))
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual core processor
- Fast processor (1000 MHz vs 1500 MHz)
in-depth comparison
