ViewSonic ViewPad 10e Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
ViewSonic ViewPad 10e vs. ViewSonic ViewPad 10
ViewSonic ViewPad 10e
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Mini HDMI (Type C))
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
ViewSonic ViewPad 10
- Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches inches)
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Fast processor (1000 MHz vs 1660 MHz)
- No rear camera
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (132 ppi vs 118 ppi)
in-depth comparison
ViewSonic ViewPad 10e vs. ViewSonic ViewPad 10Pro
ViewSonic ViewPad 10e
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Fast processor (1000 MHz vs 1500 MHz)
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Mini HDMI (Type C))
- No rear camera
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (132 ppi vs 118 ppi)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
ViewSonic ViewPad 10e vs. Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 (10.1)
ViewSonic ViewPad 10e
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Mini HDMI (Type C))
- No rear camera
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 (10.1)
- Dual core processor
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (132 ppi vs 149 ppi)
in-depth comparison
ViewSonic ViewPad 10e vs. ViewSonic ViewPad 10pi
ViewSonic ViewPad 10e
- No rear camera
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (132 ppi)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
ViewSonic ViewPad 10pi
- Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (7.09 inches inches)
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Fast processor (1000 MHz vs 1500 MHz)
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Mini HDMI (Type C) vs )
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
ViewSonic ViewPad 10e vs. Samsung GALAXY Tab 2 (7.0)
ViewSonic ViewPad 10e
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Mini HDMI (Type C))
- No rear camera
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Samsung GALAXY Tab 2 (7.0)
- Dual core processor
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (132 ppi vs 170 ppi)
in-depth comparison
ViewSonic ViewPad 10e vs. ViewSonic ViewPad E100
ViewSonic ViewPad 10e
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Mini HDMI (Type C))
- No rear camera
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (132 ppi)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
ViewSonic ViewPad 10e vs. Sony Tablet S
ViewSonic ViewPad 10e
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Mini HDMI (Type C))
- No rear camera
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Sony Tablet S
- Dual core processor
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (132 ppi vs 161 ppi)
in-depth comparison
