TerreStar Genus Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
TerreStar Genus vs. HP iPAQ Glisten
TerreStar Genus
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.76 inches inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
HP iPAQ Glisten
- Slow processor (533 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi vs 160 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
TerreStar Genus vs. LG GW550
TerreStar Genus
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.76 inches inches)
- No front-facing camera
LG GW550
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
in-depth comparison
TerreStar Genus vs. Acer beTouch E210
TerreStar Genus
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.76 inches inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Acer beTouch E210
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
TerreStar Genus vs. Nokia Lumia 510
TerreStar Genus
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.76 inches inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
TerreStar Genus vs. HTC Snap
TerreStar Genus
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.76 inches inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
HTC Snap
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (192 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
TerreStar Genus vs. HTC Pure
TerreStar Genus
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.76 inches inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
HTC Pure
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (292 ppi)
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (288 MB RAM)
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
in-depth comparison
TerreStar Genus vs. Nokia C3
TerreStar Genus
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.76 inches inches)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
Nokia C3
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison

