x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

T-Mobile myTouch 3G Fender Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

T-Mobile myTouch 3G Fender T-Mobile myTouch 3G Fender


  • Single-core processor
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera

Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (180 ppi vs 235 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (288 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



T-Mobile myTouch 3G Fender T-Mobile myTouch 3G Fender


  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera

HTC Amaze 4G HTC Amaze 4G


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (180 ppi vs 256 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (288 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)

in-depth comparison




Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (180 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (288 MB RAM vs 192 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



T-Mobile myTouch 3G Fender T-Mobile myTouch 3G Fender


  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (180 ppi vs 233 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (288 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison




Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (180 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (288 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



T-Mobile myTouch 3G Fender T-Mobile myTouch 3G Fender


  • Low pixel density screen (180 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera

Samsung Galaxy S III Samsung Galaxy S III


  • Big display (4.8 inches)
  • High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
  • High pixel densitiy screen (306 ppi)
  • Quad core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Too little RAM memory (288 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)

in-depth comparison



T-Mobile myTouch 3G Fender T-Mobile myTouch 3G Fender


  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera

T-Mobile myTouch T-Mobile myTouch


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (180 ppi vs 246 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (288 MB RAM vs 512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories