x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

T-Mobile Vivacity Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

T-Mobile Vivacity T-Mobile Vivacity


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

ZTE Blade III ZTE Blade III


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (267 ppi vs 233 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



T-Mobile Vivacity T-Mobile Vivacity


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

ZTE Blade ZTE Blade


  • Single-core processor
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (267 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



T-Mobile Vivacity T-Mobile Vivacity


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

ZTE Blade II ZTE Blade II


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (267 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



T-Mobile Vivacity T-Mobile Vivacity


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Huawei Ascend Y300 Huawei Ascend Y300


  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (267 ppi vs 233 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



T-Mobile Vivacity T-Mobile Vivacity


  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Motorola Moto E Motorola Moto E


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Splash-proof phone
  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM)
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (267 ppi vs 256 ppi)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

in-depth comparison



T-Mobile Vivacity T-Mobile Vivacity


  • Low pixel density screen (267 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Motorola Moto G Motorola Moto G


  • High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
  • High pixel densitiy screen (329 ppi)
  • Quad core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



T-Mobile Vivacity T-Mobile Vivacity


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Orange San Francisco II Orange San Francisco II


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (267 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories