x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

T-Mobile Sidekick LX Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

T-Mobile Sidekick LX T-Mobile Sidekick LX


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

T-Mobile Sidekick 4G T-Mobile Sidekick 4G


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (0.5 GB RAM)
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Full hardware keyboard for text input
  • Low pixel density screen (306 ppi vs 267 ppi)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



T-Mobile Sidekick LX T-Mobile Sidekick LX


  • Low pixel density screen (306 ppi)

Danger Sidekick 3 Danger Sidekick 3


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Too little RAM memory ( GB RAM)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Full hardware keyboard for text input
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches vs 0.85 inches inches)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



T-Mobile Sidekick LX T-Mobile Sidekick LX


  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)

Danger Sidekick iD Danger Sidekick iD


  • No rear camera
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Full hardware keyboard for text input
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (306 ppi vs 120 ppi)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches vs 0.87 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



T-Mobile Sidekick LX T-Mobile Sidekick LX


  • Full hardware keyboard for text input
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Samsung Galaxy S III Samsung Galaxy S III


  • Lightweight phone
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
  • Too little RAM memory (1 GB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (306 ppi)

in-depth comparison



T-Mobile Sidekick LX T-Mobile Sidekick LX


  • Full hardware keyboard for text input
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia Asha 230 Nokia Asha 230


  • Dual SIM card support
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (306 ppi vs 143 ppi)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



T-Mobile Sidekick LX T-Mobile Sidekick LX


  • Low pixel density screen (306 ppi)

T-Mobile Sidekick Slide T-Mobile Sidekick Slide


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Full hardware keyboard for text input
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches vs 0.68 inches inches)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



T-Mobile Sidekick T-Mobile Sidekick


  • Too little RAM memory (0.125 GB RAM)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Full hardware keyboard for text input
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (306 ppi vs 179 ppi)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches vs 0.70 inches inches)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories