x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

T-Mobile Sidekick LX Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

T-Mobile Sidekick LX T-Mobile Sidekick LX


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (155 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (400 x 240 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

T-Mobile Sidekick LX T-Mobile Sidekick LX


  • High pixel densitiy screen (306 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches vs 0.64 inches inches)
  • Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



T-Mobile Sidekick LX T-Mobile Sidekick LX


  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches)
  • Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia X2-01 Nokia X2-01


  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (155 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (400 x 240 pixels vs 320 x 240 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



T-Mobile Sidekick LX T-Mobile Sidekick LX


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

T-Mobile Sidekick 4G T-Mobile Sidekick 4G


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Single-core processor
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (155 ppi vs 267 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (400 x 240 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



T-Mobile Sidekick LX T-Mobile Sidekick LX


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (155 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (400 x 240 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia 2760 Nokia 2760


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches vs 0.82 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



T-Mobile Sidekick LX T-Mobile Sidekick LX


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Casio G'zOne Commando Casio G'zOne Commando


  • Splash-proof phone
  • Single-core processor

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (155 ppi vs 259 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (400 x 240 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



T-Mobile Sidekick LX T-Mobile Sidekick LX


  • Low pixel density screen (155 ppi)

Danger Sidekick 3 Danger Sidekick 3


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches vs 0.85 inches inches)
  • Low resolution display (400 x 240 pixels vs 240 x 160 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison



T-Mobile Sidekick LX T-Mobile Sidekick LX


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (155 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches)
  • Low resolution display (400 x 240 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Samsung Galaxy S III Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III Sprint


  • Big display (4.8 inches)
  • High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
  • High pixel densitiy screen (306 ppi)
  • Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories