Sony Ericsson Z320 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Sony Ericsson Z320 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Sony Ericsson Z320 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Sony Ericsson Z320 vs Nokia 6600 fold
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Sony Ericsson Z320-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.80 inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Nokia 6600 fold-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.45 x 1.73 x 0.62 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low-resolution video capture
Sony Ericsson Z320 vs Pantech PG-C3b
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi vs 119 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.80 inches vs 0.79 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 128 x 128 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Sony Ericsson Z320-specific Pros & Cons
none
Pantech PG-C3b-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (2.71 x 1.69 x 0.79 inches)
Sony Ericsson Z320 vs Samsung Vodafone 360 M1
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi vs 146 ppi)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
Sony Ericsson Z320-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.80 inches)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Vodafone 360 M1-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution video capture
Sony Ericsson Z320 vs Sony Ericsson Z250
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.80 inches vs 0.76 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Sony Ericsson Z320-specific Pros & Cons
none
Sony Ericsson Z250-specific Pros & Cons
none
Sony Ericsson Z320 vs Samsung Star II
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi vs 155 ppi)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Sony Ericsson Z320-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.80 inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Star II-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Sony Ericsson Z320 vs Sony Ericsson Equinox
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Sony Ericsson Z320-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.80 inches)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Sony Ericsson Equinox-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.66 x 1.97 x 0.56 inches)
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Sony Ericsson Z320 vs Sony Ericsson Z750
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.80 inches vs 0.78 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Sony Ericsson Z320-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
Sony Ericsson Z750-specific Pros & Cons
none
Sony Ericsson Z320 vs Sony Ericsson Z610
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.80 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Sony Ericsson Z320-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
Sony Ericsson Z610-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (GPRS, UMTS)
