Sony Ericsson Xperia X1 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Sony Ericsson Xperia X1 vs. Sony Ericsson XPERIA X2
Sony Ericsson Xperia X1
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (311 ppi vs 292 ppi)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 288 MB RAM)
in-depth comparison
Sony Ericsson Xperia X1 vs. Sony Ericsson Xperia pro
Sony Ericsson Xperia X1
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Sony Ericsson Xperia pro
- High-resolution camera (8.1 megapixels)
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- HDMI connector for TV-out ()
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (311 ppi vs 265 ppi)
in-depth comparison
Sony Ericsson Xperia X1 vs. Google Nexus 4
Sony Ericsson Xperia X1
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Google Nexus 4
- Quad core processor
- Very big display (4.7 inches)
- High-resolution display (768 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1500 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (311 ppi vs 318 ppi)
in-depth comparison
Sony Ericsson Xperia X1 vs. Sony Xperia U
Sony Ericsson Xperia X1
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Sony Xperia U
- Dual core processor
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (311 ppi vs 280 ppi)
in-depth comparison
Sony Ericsson Xperia X1 vs. Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T
Sony Ericsson Xperia X1
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T
- Dual core processor
- Very big display (4.8 inches)
- High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1500 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (311 ppi vs 306 ppi)
in-depth comparison
Sony Ericsson Xperia X1 vs. HTC TyTN II
Sony Ericsson Xperia X1
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (311 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
HTC TyTN II
- Slow processor (400 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches vs 0.74 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
in-depth comparison
Sony Ericsson Xperia X1 vs. Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini
Sony Ericsson Xperia X1
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (311 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini
- Small dimensions (3.27 x 1.97 x 0.63 inches inches)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (157 ppi)
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
