Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini pro Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini pro vs. Sony Ericsson Xperia mini pro
Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini pro
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (157 ppi)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches vs 0.71 inches inches)
in-depth comparison
Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini pro vs. Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini
Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini pro
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini
- Small dimensions (3.27 x 1.97 x 0.63 inches inches)
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (157 ppi)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini pro vs. Sony Ericsson Xperia mini
Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini pro
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (157 ppi)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini pro vs. Sony Xperia U
Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini pro
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (157 ppi)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
Sony Xperia U
- Dual core processor
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (280 ppi)
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini pro vs. Sony Xperia tipo
Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini pro
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (157 ppi)
Sony Xperia tipo
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini pro vs. Sony Ericsson Xperia X8
Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini pro
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (157 ppi)
Sony Ericsson Xperia X8
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini pro vs. Samsung Galaxy Y
Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini pro
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
Samsung Galaxy Y
- Small dimensions (4.09 x 2.28 x 0.45 inches inches)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (157 ppi vs 133 ppi)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
