x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini pro Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini pro Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini pro


  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Sony Ericsson Xperia mini pro Sony Ericsson Xperia mini pro


  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (157 ppi vs 192 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches vs 0.71 inches inches)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini pro Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini pro


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)

Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini


  • Small dimensions (3.27 x 1.97 x 0.63 inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (157 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini pro Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini pro


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Sony Ericsson Xperia mini Sony Ericsson Xperia mini


  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (157 ppi vs 192 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison




Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (157 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini pro Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini pro


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)

Sony Ericsson Xperia X8 Sony Ericsson Xperia X8


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (157 ppi vs 192 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini pro Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini pro


  • Single-core processor
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Sony Xperia M2 Sony Xperia M2


  • Big display (4.8 inches)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (157 ppi vs 229 ppi)

in-depth comparison



Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini pro Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini pro


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Sony Ericsson Xperia pro Sony Ericsson Xperia pro


  • HDMI connector for TV-out ()

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (157 ppi vs 265 ppi)
  • Single-core processor

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories