x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Sony Ericsson W350 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Sony Ericsson W350 Sony Ericsson W350


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Nokia E72 Nokia E72


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.69 x 0.43 inches vs 4.49 x 2.28 x 0.39 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (148 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 320 x 240 pixels)

in-depth comparison



Sony Ericsson W350 Sony Ericsson W350


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Sony Ericsson W995 Sony Ericsson W995


  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.69 x 0.43 inches vs 3.82 x 1.93 x 0.59 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (148 ppi vs 154 ppi)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)

in-depth comparison



Sony Ericsson W350 Sony Ericsson W350


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (148 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.69 x 0.43 inches vs 4.10 x 1.83 x 0.38 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Sony Ericsson W980 Sony Ericsson W980


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.69 x 0.43 inches vs 3.62 x 1.81 x 0.66 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (148 ppi vs 182 ppi)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Sony Ericsson W350 Sony Ericsson W350


  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.69 x 0.43 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (148 ppi)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo


  • Big display (5.1 inches)
  • Extremely high pixel density screen, over 430ppi (432 ppi)
  • High-resolution camera (16 megapixels)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Sony Ericsson W350 Sony Ericsson W350


  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.69 x 0.43 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (148 ppi)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Sony Xperia M5 Sony Xperia M5


  • Big display (5.0 inches)
  • Extremely high pixel density screen, over 430ppi (441 ppi)
  • Lots of RAM (3072 MB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Water-resistant phone

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Sony Ericsson W350 Sony Ericsson W350


  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.69 x 0.43 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (148 ppi)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7


  • Thin body, measuring less than 7.5mm/0.3inches (0.29 inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • The camera lacks flash

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories