Sony Ericsson W205a Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Sony Ericsson W205a the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Sony Ericsson W205a compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Sony Ericsson W205a vs Sony Ericsson Spiro a
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches vs 0.66 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Sony Ericsson W205a-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.62 x 1.85 x 0.65 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Sony Ericsson Spiro a-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
Sony Ericsson W205a vs Sony Ericsson Spiro
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches vs 0.66 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Sony Ericsson W205a-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.62 x 1.85 x 0.65 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Sony Ericsson Spiro-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
Sony Ericsson W205a vs Sony Ericsson R306
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.62 x 1.85 x 0.65 inches vs 3.54 x 1.88 x 0.62 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Sony Ericsson W205a-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches)
Sony Ericsson R306-specific Pros & Cons
none
Sony Ericsson W205a vs Sony Ericsson W705
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.62 x 1.85 x 0.65 inches vs 3.74 x 1.87 x 0.56 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Sony Ericsson W205a-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches)
Sony Ericsson W705-specific Pros & Cons
none
Sony Ericsson W205a vs Sony Ericsson W980
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.62 x 1.85 x 0.65 inches vs 3.62 x 1.81 x 0.66 inches)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches vs 0.66 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Sony Ericsson W205a-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
Sony Ericsson W980-specific Pros & Cons
none
Sony Ericsson W205a vs Nokia C2-00
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.62 x 1.85 x 0.65 inches vs 4.25 x 1.77 x 0.57 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Sony Ericsson W205a-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia C2-00-specific Pros & Cons
- Too little RAM memory (16 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Sony Ericsson W205a vs Sony Ericsson Xperia ray
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.62 x 1.85 x 0.65 inches vs 4.37 x 2.09 x 0.37 inches)
Sony Ericsson W205a-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Sony Ericsson Xperia ray-specific Pros & Cons
- Thin body, measuring less than 9.5mm/0.37inches (0.37 inches)
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (297 ppi)
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- High-resolution camera (8.1 megapixels)
Sony Ericsson W205a vs Sony Ericsson Elm
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.62 x 1.85 x 0.65 inches vs 4.33 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Sony Ericsson W205a-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Sony Ericsson Elm-specific Pros & Cons
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
