x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Sony Ericsson Vivaz Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Sony Ericsson Vivaz Sony Ericsson Vivaz


  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera

Sony Ericsson Xperia ray Sony Ericsson Xperia ray


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (0.5 GB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.21 x 2.04 x 0.49 inches vs 4.37 x 2.09 x 0.37 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (229 ppi vs 297 ppi)

in-depth comparison



Sony Ericsson Vivaz Sony Ericsson Vivaz


  • Small dimensions (4.21 x 2.04 x 0.49 inches)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia N8 Nokia N8


  • Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (Mini HDMI (Type C))
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (0.25 GB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (229 ppi vs 210 ppi)

in-depth comparison



Sony Ericsson Vivaz Sony Ericsson Vivaz


  • Small dimensions (4.21 x 2.04 x 0.49 inches)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Sony Ericsson Vivaz pro Sony Ericsson Vivaz pro


  • Full hardware keyboard for text input
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (229 ppi)
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Sony Ericsson Vivaz Sony Ericsson Vivaz


  • Small dimensions (4.21 x 2.04 x 0.49 inches)
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera

Sony Ericsson Satio Sony Ericsson Satio


  • Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (0.25 GB RAM)
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (229 ppi vs 210 ppi)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be

in-depth comparison



Sony Ericsson Vivaz Sony Ericsson Vivaz


  • Small dimensions (4.21 x 2.04 x 0.49 inches)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera

Sony Ericsson Xperia neo Sony Ericsson Xperia neo


  • HDMI connector for TV-out (Micro HDMI (Type D))
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (0.5 GB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (229 ppi vs 265 ppi)

in-depth comparison



Sony Ericsson Vivaz Sony Ericsson Vivaz


  • Small dimensions (4.21 x 2.04 x 0.49 inches)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Sony Ericsson Xperia mini Sony Ericsson Xperia mini


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (0.5 GB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (229 ppi vs 192 ppi)
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Sony Ericsson Vivaz Sony Ericsson Vivaz


  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera

Sony Ericsson W995 Sony Ericsson W995


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.21 x 2.04 x 0.49 inches vs 3.82 x 1.93 x 0.59 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (229 ppi vs 154 ppi)

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories