Sony Ericsson K800 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Sony Ericsson K800 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Sony Ericsson K800 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Sony Ericsson K800 vs Alcatel OT-803
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (GPRS, UMTS vs EDGE)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Sony Ericsson K800-specific Pros & Cons
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.90 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Alcatel OT-803-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Slow processor (208 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Sony Ericsson K800 vs Nokia N95
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.90 inches vs 0.82 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Sony Ericsson K800-specific Pros & Cons
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (GPRS, UMTS)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia N95-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Slow processor (332 MHz)
- Bulky
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Sony Ericsson K800 vs Sony Ericsson K850
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.90 inches vs 0.66 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Sony Ericsson K800-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (GPRS, UMTS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Sony Ericsson K850-specific Pros & Cons
none
Sony Ericsson K800 vs Sony Ericsson W810
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (GPRS, UMTS vs EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.90 inches vs 0.80 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Sony Ericsson K800-specific Pros & Cons
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
Sony Ericsson W810-specific Pros & Cons
none
Sony Ericsson K800 vs Sony Ericsson Hazel
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Sony Ericsson K800-specific Pros & Cons
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (GPRS, UMTS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.90 inches)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Sony Ericsson Hazel-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Sony Ericsson K800 vs Sony Ericsson K810
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (GPRS, UMTS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.90 inches vs 0.66 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Sony Ericsson K800-specific Pros & Cons
none
Sony Ericsson K810-specific Pros & Cons
none
Sony Ericsson K800 vs Nokia 6610
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.90 inches vs 0.69 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 128 x 128 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Sony Ericsson K800-specific Pros & Cons
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (GPRS, UMTS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
Nokia 6610-specific Pros & Cons
none
Sony Ericsson K800 vs Nokia 6303 classic
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (GPRS, UMTS vs EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Sony Ericsson K800-specific Pros & Cons
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.90 inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia 6303 classic-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.28 x 1.82 x 0.46 inches)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
