Sony Ericsson Cedar a Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Sony Ericsson Cedar a vs. Sony Ericsson Cedar
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Sony Ericsson Cedar a vs. Sony Ericsson Elm
Sony Ericsson Cedar a
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Sony Ericsson Elm
- Small dimensions (4.33 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Sony Ericsson Cedar a vs. Nokia C3 Touch and Type
Nokia C3 Touch and Type
- Small dimensions (4.37 x 1.87 x 0.43 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Sony Ericsson Cedar a vs. Nokia 301
Sony Ericsson Cedar a
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Sony Ericsson Cedar a vs. Nokia C2-01
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Sony Ericsson Cedar a vs. Nokia Asha 300
Nokia Asha 300
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Small dimensions (4.44 x 1.95 x 0.50 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Sony Ericsson Cedar a vs. Sony Ericsson txt
Sony Ericsson Cedar a
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
Sony Ericsson txt
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
