x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Sony Ericsson Cedar a Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.


Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Sony Ericsson Cedar a Sony Ericsson Cedar a


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Sony Ericsson Elm Sony Ericsson Elm


  • Small dimensions (4.33 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches inches)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Nokia C2-01 Nokia C2-01


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 200 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Sony Ericsson Cedar a Sony Ericsson Cedar a


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Nokia 301 Nokia 301


  • Small dimensions (4.49 x 1.97 x 0.49 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Sony Ericsson Cedar a Sony Ericsson Cedar a


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Nokia Lumia 800 Nokia Lumia 800


  • High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Nokia Asha 300 Nokia Asha 300


  • Small dimensions (4.44 x 1.95 x 0.50 inches inches)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Sony Ericsson Cedar a Sony Ericsson Cedar a


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Nokia Asha 303 Nokia Asha 303


  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 154 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories