Samsung Xcover 2 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung Xcover 2 vs. Samsung Xcover 271
Samsung Xcover 2
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Water-resistant phone
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS vs EDGE, UMTS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Xcover 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Xcover
Samsung Xcover 2
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Galaxy Xcover
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Water-resistant phone
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 158 ppi)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Xcover 2 vs. Samsung E2370
Samsung Xcover 2
- Water-resistant phone
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches vs 0.75 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Xcover 2 vs. Samsung B2100
Samsung Xcover 2
- Water-resistant phone
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS vs EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches vs 0.69 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Xcover 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Xcover 2
Samsung Xcover 2
- Water-resistant phone
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Samsung Xcover 2 vs. Samsung B2700
Samsung Xcover 2
- Water-resistant phone
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS vs EDGE, UMTS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches vs 0.71 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Xcover 2 vs. Samsung E1232
Samsung Xcover 2
- Water-resistant phone
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung E1232
- Dual SIM card support
- Small dimensions (4.35 x 1.79 x 0.55 inches inches)
- No rear camera
- Lacks an e-mail client
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
