x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Samsung Wave 578 Samsung Wave 578


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Samsung Wave 3 Samsung Wave 3


  • Single-core processor

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi vs 233 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Wave 578 Samsung Wave 578


  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Samsung Wave 575 Samsung Wave 575


  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 2.17 x 0.47 inches)
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Wave 578 Samsung Wave 578


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Samsung Wave II Samsung Wave II


  • Single-core processor

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi vs 252 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Wave 578 Samsung Wave 578


  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Samsung Wave 533 Samsung Wave 533


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Wave 578 Samsung Wave 578


  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Samsung Wave 525 Samsung Wave 525


  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 2.17 x 0.47 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Wave 578 Samsung Wave 578


  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Samsung Galaxy Y Samsung Galaxy Y


  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 2.28 x 0.45 inches)
  • Single-core processor
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi vs 133 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Wave 578 Samsung Wave 578


  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Samsung Galaxy S II Samsung Galaxy S II


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
  • Small dimensions (4.93 x 2.60 x 0.33 inches)
  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi vs 218 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories