x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Samsung Wave 525 Samsung Wave 525


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 2.17 x 0.47 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Samsung Wave 525 Samsung Wave 525


  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 2.17 x 0.47 inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Samsung Wave 525 Samsung Wave 525


  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 2.17 x 0.47 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 320 x 240 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Wave 525 Samsung Wave 525


  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 2.17 x 0.47 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Nokia Lumia 525 Nokia Lumia 525


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi vs 235 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Samsung Wave 525 Samsung Wave 525


  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 2.17 x 0.47 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Motorola Moto E Motorola Moto E


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Splash-proof phone
  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM)
  • Battery is not user replaceable

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi vs 256 ppi)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Samsung Wave 525 Samsung Wave 525


  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 2.17 x 0.47 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Samsung Galaxy Ace Samsung Galaxy Ace


  • Single-core processor

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi vs 165 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Samsung Wave 525 Samsung Wave 525


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia Asha 300 Nokia Asha 300


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 2.17 x 0.47 inches vs 4.44 x 1.95 x 0.50 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories