x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Samsung Wave 525 Samsung Wave 525


  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 2.17 x 0.47 inches inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Nokia Lumia 520 Nokia Lumia 520


  • Dual core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Samsung Wave 525 Samsung Wave 525


  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 2.17 x 0.47 inches inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Nokia Lumia 525 Nokia Lumia 525


  • Dual core processor
  • Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Samsung Wave 525 Samsung Wave 525


  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 2.17 x 0.47 inches inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)

Samsung Galaxy Y DUOS Samsung Galaxy Y DUOS


  • Dual SIM card support

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi vs 127 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Samsung Wave 525 Samsung Wave 525


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 2.17 x 0.47 inches inches vs 4.09 x 2.28 x 0.45 inches inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi vs 133 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Samsung Wave 525 Samsung Wave 525


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 2.17 x 0.47 inches inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Samsung Wave 525 Samsung Wave 525


  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 2.17 x 0.47 inches inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Samsung Galaxy Grand Samsung Galaxy Grand


  • Big display (5.0 inches)
  • High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
  • Dual core processor
  • Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi vs 187 ppi)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Wave 525 Samsung Wave 525


  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 2.17 x 0.47 inches inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi vs 180 ppi)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories