Samsung Star Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Samsung Star the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Samsung Star compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung Star vs Samsung Star WiFi
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.09 x 2.09 x 0.47 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Star-specific Pros & Cons
none
Samsung Star WiFi-specific Pros & Cons
none
Samsung Star vs Samsung Star II
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Star-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.09 x 2.09 x 0.47 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Star II-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Samsung Star vs Samsung Galaxy Ace
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi vs 165 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Star-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.09 x 2.09 x 0.47 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Galaxy Ace-specific Pros & Cons
none
Samsung Star vs Samsung Behold
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.09 x 2.09 x 0.47 inches vs 4.12 x 2.10 x 0.50 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Star-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
Samsung Behold-specific Pros & Cons
none
Samsung Star vs Samsung Galaxy Y
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.09 x 2.09 x 0.47 inches vs 4.09 x 2.28 x 0.45 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi vs 133 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Star-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Galaxy Y-specific Pros & Cons
none
Samsung Star vs Samsung GALAXY mini
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi vs 127 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Star-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.09 x 2.09 x 0.47 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung GALAXY mini-specific Pros & Cons
none
Samsung Star vs LG Cookie
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.09 x 2.09 x 0.47 inches vs 4.19 x 2.18 x 0.47 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Star-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution video capture
LG Cookie-specific Pros & Cons
none
Samsung Star vs Samsung Star TV
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.09 x 2.09 x 0.47 inches vs 4.17 x 2.11 x 0.47 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Star-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution video capture
Samsung Star TV-specific Pros & Cons
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
