Samsung Smooth Rivals and Competitors

Rivals

Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Samsung Smooth the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Samsung Smooth compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.

Samsung Smooth vs LG Chocolate 3

Samsung Smooth VS. LG Chocolate 3
Compare them to see their detailed specs side by side.

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.76 inches vs 0.64 inches)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Smooth-specific Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (108 ppi)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack

LG Chocolate 3-specific Pros & Cons

  • Low-resolution video capture

Samsung Smooth vs Samsung Gusto

Samsung Smooth VS. Samsung Gusto
Compare them to see their detailed specs side by side.

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (108 ppi vs 102 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Smooth-specific Pros & Cons

  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.76 inches)

Samsung Gusto-specific Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.99 x 1.86 x 0.56 inches)

Samsung Smooth vs LG VX8550

Samsung Smooth VS. LG VX8550
Compare them to see their detailed specs side by side.

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.76 inches vs 0.67 inches)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 1.3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Smooth-specific Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (108 ppi)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

LG VX8550-specific Pros & Cons

  • Low-resolution video capture

Samsung Smooth vs Motorola Entice W766

Samsung Smooth VS. Motorola Entice W766
Compare them to see their detailed specs side by side.

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (108 ppi vs 128 ppi)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.76 inches vs 0.70 inches)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Smooth-specific Pros & Cons

  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Motorola Entice W766-specific Pros & Cons

none

Samsung Smooth vs Samsung Trance

Samsung Smooth VS. Samsung Trance
Compare them to see their detailed specs side by side.

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (108 ppi vs 134 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 1.3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Smooth-specific Pros & Cons

  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.76 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack

Samsung Trance-specific Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.00 x 1.97 x 0.55 inches)

Samsung Smooth vs PCD G'zOne Type-V / Casio Hitachi G-Shock NX9200

Samsung Smooth VS. PCD G'zOne Type-V / Casio Hitachi G-Shock NX9200
Compare them to see their detailed specs side by side.

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.76 inches vs 1.10 inches)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Smooth-specific Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (108 ppi)

PCD G'zOne Type-V / Casio Hitachi G-Shock NX9200-specific Pros & Cons

none

Samsung Smooth vs Samsung SCH-U340

Samsung Smooth VS. Samsung SCH-U340
Compare them to see their detailed specs side by side.

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.76 inches vs 0.80 inches)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Smooth-specific Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (108 ppi)

Samsung SCH-U340-specific Pros & Cons

none

Samsung Smooth vs PCD Casio G'zOne Type-S

Samsung Smooth VS. PCD Casio G'zOne Type-S
Compare them to see their detailed specs side by side.

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (108 ppi vs 157 ppi)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.76 inches vs 1.10 inches)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Smooth-specific Pros & Cons

none

PCD Casio G'zOne Type-S-specific Pros & Cons

none

All content (phone reviews, news, specs, info), design and layouts are Copyright 2001-2012 phoneArena.com. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part or in any form or medium without written permission is prohibited!
Privacy | Terms of use