Samsung Shark S5350 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Samsung Shark S5350 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Samsung Shark S5350 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung Shark S5350 vs Samsung S5350L
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Shark S5350-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution video capture
Samsung S5350L-specific Pros & Cons
none
Samsung Shark S5350 vs Samsung Ch@t 335
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Shark S5350-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Ch@t 335-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
Samsung Shark S5350 vs Samsung SGH-L700
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches vs 4.29 x 1.81 x 0.50 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Shark S5350-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution video capture
Samsung SGH-L700-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (134 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
Samsung Shark S5350 vs Sony Ericsson S312
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches vs 3.94 x 1.81 x 0.49 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Shark S5350-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution video capture
Sony Ericsson S312-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (141 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Samsung Shark S5350 vs Samsung C3750
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Shark S5350-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung C3750-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
Samsung Shark S5350 vs Nokia E63
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Shark S5350-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia E63-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (169 ppi)
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
- Too little RAM memory (71 MB RAM)
Samsung Shark S5350 vs Samsung Shark 2 S5550
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Shark S5350-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Samsung Shark 2 S5550-specific Pros & Cons
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Samsung Shark S5350 vs Samsung C3530
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches vs 4.41 x 1.81 x 0.43 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Shark S5350-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung C3530-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
