x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Samsung Shark S5350 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Samsung Shark S5350 Samsung Shark S5350


  • Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Does not support automatic screen brightness
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 167 ppi)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark S5350 Samsung Shark S5350


  • Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches)

Nokia C2-01 Nokia C2-01


  • Does not support fast data speeds (UMTS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Does not support automatic screen brightness
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 200 ppi)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark S5350 Samsung Shark S5350


  • The camera lacks flash

Spice Mobile G-6550 Spice Mobile G-6550


  • Dual SIM card support

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches vs 4.25 x 1.81 x 0.53 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Does not support automatic screen brightness
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)

in-depth comparison



Nokia X3 Touch and Type Nokia X3 Touch and Type


  • The touchscreen uses resistive technology, which is not responsive
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches vs 4.18 x 1.91 x 0.38 inches)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Does not support automatic screen brightness
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 167 ppi)

in-depth comparison




Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches vs 4.31 x 1.89 x 0.54 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Does not support automatic screen brightness
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)

in-depth comparison



Latest stories