x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Samsung Shark S5350 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Samsung Shark S5350 Samsung Shark S5350


  • Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung GALAXY S Advance Samsung GALAXY S Advance


  • Too little RAM memory (768 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 233 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark S5350 Samsung Shark S5350


  • Low-resolution video capture

Samsung Shark 3 S3550 Samsung Shark 3 S3550


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches vs 3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 200 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark S5350 Samsung Shark S5350


  • Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches)
  • The camera lacks flash

Nokia 5320 XpressMusic Nokia 5320 XpressMusic


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 200 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark S5350 Samsung Shark S5350


  • Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

HTC Desire 310 HTC Desire 310


  • Quad core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 218 ppi)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark S5350 Samsung Shark S5350


  • Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

LG F60 LG F60


  • Quad core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 207 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark S5350 Samsung Shark S5350


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The camera lacks flash

Nokia C3 Touch and Type Nokia C3 Touch and Type


  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches vs 4.37 x 1.87 x 0.43 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark S5350 Samsung Shark S5350


  • Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

Sony Ericsson W800 Sony Ericsson W800


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.80 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories