Samsung Shark S5350 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung Shark S5350 vs. Samsung S5350L
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Shark S5350 vs. Samsung Shark 3 S3550
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches inches vs 3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Shark S5350 vs. Samsung Primo
Samsung Shark S5350
- Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches inches)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Shark S5350 vs. Samsung Shark 2 S5550
Samsung Shark S5350
- Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches inches)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Samsung Shark 2 S5550
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Shark S5350 vs. Samsung Galaxy Y Pro DUOS
Samsung Shark S5350
- Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Galaxy Y Pro DUOS
- Dual SIM card support
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Shark S5350 vs. Sony Ericsson S302
Samsung Shark S5350
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
Sony Ericsson S302
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches inches vs 3.98 x 1.81 x 0.43 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Shark S5350 vs. Samsung Galaxy Chat
Samsung Shark S5350
- Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Galaxy Chat
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (133 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
