x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Samsung Shark S5350 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Samsung Shark S5350 Samsung Shark S5350


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Sony Ericsson W902 Sony Ericsson W902


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches vs 4.33 x 1.93 x 0.46 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark S5350 Samsung Shark S5350


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Sony Ericsson Elm Sony Ericsson Elm


  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches vs 4.33 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark S5350 Samsung Shark S5350


  • Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches)
  • The camera lacks flash

Nokia 5320 XpressMusic Nokia 5320 XpressMusic


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 200 ppi)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark S5350 Samsung Shark S5350


  • Low-resolution video capture

Sony Ericsson G502 Sony Ericsson G502


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches vs 4.29 x 1.81 x 0.53 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 200 ppi)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark S5350 Samsung Shark S5350


  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches vs 4.08 x 1.75 x 0.38 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 200 ppi)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark S5350 Samsung Shark S5350


  • Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Galaxy S5 mini Samsung Galaxy S5 mini


  • High pixel density screen (326 ppi)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Water-resistant phone
  • Too little RAM memory (1536 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark S5350 Samsung Shark S5350


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Galaxy A3 (2016) Samsung Galaxy A3 (2016)


  • High pixel density screen (312 ppi)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Thin body, measuring less than 7.5mm/0.3inches (0.29 inches)
  • Too little RAM memory (1536 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches vs 5.30 x 2.57 x 0.29 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 312 ppi)

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories