x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Samsung Shark S5350 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Samsung Shark S5350 Samsung Shark S5350


  • Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark S5350 Samsung Shark S5350


  • The camera lacks flash

Spice Mobile G-6550 Spice Mobile G-6550


  • Dual SIM card support

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches vs 4.25 x 1.81 x 0.53 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark S5350 Samsung Shark S5350


  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches vs 4.31 x 1.89 x 0.54 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark S5350 Samsung Shark S5350


  • Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Galaxy S5 mini Samsung Galaxy S5 mini


  • Lightweight phone
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Water-resistant phone
  • Too little RAM memory (1.5 GB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark S5350 Samsung Shark S5350


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Galaxy A3 (2016) Samsung Galaxy A3 (2016)


  • Lightweight phone
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Thin body, measuring less than 7.5mm/0.3inches (0.29 inches)
  • Too little RAM memory (1.5 GB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches vs 5.30 x 2.57 x 0.29 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 312 ppi)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark S5350 Samsung Shark S5350


  • Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Samsung Shark 2 S5550 Samsung Shark 2 S5550


  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark S5350 Samsung Shark S5350


  • Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches)

Nokia C2-01 Nokia C2-01


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 200 ppi)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories