x We have placed cookies on your device to make your experience better. Find more info here.

Samsung Shark 3 S3550 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.


Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches vs 3.88 x 1.91 x 0.56 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi vs 100 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 120 x 160 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 3 S3550 Samsung Shark 3 S3550


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches vs 3.93 x 1.96 x 0.55 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 3 S3550 Samsung Shark 3 S3550


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Samsung SGH-E950 Samsung SGH-E950


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches vs 3.66 x 1.77 x 0.64 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 3 S3550 Samsung Shark 3 S3550


  • Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Samsung SGH-D500 Samsung SGH-D500


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.92 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 3 S3550 Samsung Shark 3 S3550


  • The camera lacks flash

Nokia 6600 fold Nokia 6600 fold


  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches vs 3.45 x 1.73 x 0.62 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs UMTS, EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi vs 188 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 3 S3550 Samsung Shark 3 S3550


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)

Samsung Shark S5350 Samsung Shark S5350


  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches vs 4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi vs 182 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 3 S3550 Samsung Shark 3 S3550


  • Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories