x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Samsung Shark 3 S3550 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Samsung Shark 3 S3550 Samsung Shark 3 S3550


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)

Samsung Shark S5350 Samsung Shark S5350


  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches vs 4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi vs 182 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 3 S3550 Samsung Shark 3 S3550


  • Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Samsung Shark 2 S5550 Samsung Shark 2 S5550


  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi vs 182 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 3 S3550 Samsung Shark 3 S3550


  • Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Samsung SGH-P900 Samsung SGH-P900


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (1.06 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 3 S3550 Samsung Shark 3 S3550


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches vs 3.86 x 1.85 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 3 S3550 Samsung Shark 3 S3550


  • Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Galaxy Chat Samsung Galaxy Chat


  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi vs 133 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 3 S3550 Samsung Shark 3 S3550


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)

Samsung Galaxy Y Samsung Galaxy Y


  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches vs 4.09 x 2.28 x 0.45 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi vs 133 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 3 S3550 Samsung Shark 3 S3550


  • Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Galaxy Young 2 Samsung Galaxy Young 2


  • Dual SIM card support
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi vs 165 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 320 x 480 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories