Samsung Shark 3 S3550 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung Shark 3 S3550 vs. Samsung Shark 2 S5550
Samsung Shark 3 S3550
- Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Samsung Shark 2 S5550
- Low-resolution video capture
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Shark 3 S3550 vs. Samsung Monte Slider
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches inches vs 3.88 x 1.91 x 0.56 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 120 x 160 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Shark 3 S3550 vs. Samsung C3050
Samsung Shark 3 S3550
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches inches vs 3.82 x 1.86 x 0.59 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Shark 3 S3550 vs. Samsung Shark S5350
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches inches vs 4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Shark 3 S3550 vs. Samsung E2600
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, GPRS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Shark 3 S3550 vs. Samsung SGH-G600
Samsung Shark 3 S3550
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches inches vs 3.97 x 1.85 x 0.58 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Shark 3 S3550 vs. Samsung GALAXY mini 2
Samsung Shark 3 S3550
- Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung GALAXY mini 2
- NFC
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (176 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
More Rivals
-
1.
Samsung officials confirm 5.9-inch Note III will come at IFA in September, Galaxy S4 to hit 10 million sales next week
-
2.
What happens when the HTC One is overclocked to 2.0GHz?
-
3.
Watch this hilarious Lumia 920 commercial
-
4.
Rumored specs for the "rugged" Samsung Galaxy S4 reveal a different processor under the hood
