Samsung Shark 3 S3550 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Samsung Shark 3 S3550 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Samsung Shark 3 S3550 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung Shark 3 S3550 vs Sony Ericsson Spiro
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Shark 3 S3550-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Sony Ericsson Spiro-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches)
Samsung Shark 3 S3550 vs Samsung Monte Slider
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches vs 3.88 x 1.91 x 0.56 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 120 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Shark 3 S3550-specific Pros & Cons
none
Samsung Monte Slider-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (100 ppi)
Samsung Shark 3 S3550 vs Sony Ericsson Spiro a
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Shark 3 S3550-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Sony Ericsson Spiro a-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches)
Samsung Shark 3 S3550 vs Samsung Beat Techno
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Shark 3 S3550-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Beat Techno-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi)
Samsung Shark 3 S3550 vs Samsung C5130
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs UMTS, EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Shark 3 S3550-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches)
Samsung C5130-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
Samsung Shark 3 S3550 vs Samsung Shark 2 S5550
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Shark 3 S3550-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Samsung Shark 2 S5550-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution video capture
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Samsung Shark 3 S3550 vs Nokia C3
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Shark 3 S3550-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia C3-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Samsung Shark 3 S3550 vs Samsung SGH-P900
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Shark 3 S3550-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches)
Samsung SGH-P900-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (1.06 inches)
