x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Samsung Shark 3 S3550 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Samsung Shark 3 S3550 Samsung Shark 3 S3550


  • Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Samsung Shark 2 S5550 Samsung Shark 2 S5550


  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi vs 182 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 3 S3550 Samsung Shark 3 S3550


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)

Samsung Shark S5350 Samsung Shark S5350


  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches inches vs 4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi vs 182 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 3 S3550 Samsung Shark 3 S3550


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches inches vs 3.74 x 1.85 x 0.59 inches inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 3 S3550 Samsung Shark 3 S3550


  • Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, GPRS)
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 3 S3550 Samsung Shark 3 S3550


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Motorola RAZR V3 Motorola RAZR V3


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches inches vs 3.85 x 2.08 x 0.54 inches inches)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 3 S3550 Samsung Shark 3 S3550


  • Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Motorola RAZR V3x (V1150) Motorola RAZR V3x (V1150)


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.77 inches inches)
  • Lacks an e-mail client

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs UMTS, GPRS)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 3 S3550 Samsung Shark 3 S3550


  • Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches inches)

Samsung Xcover 2 Samsung Xcover 2


  • Water-resistant phone
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, GPRS)
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi vs 182 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories