Samsung Shark 2 S5550 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung Shark 2 S5550 vs. Samsung Shark 3 S3550
Samsung Shark 2 S5550
- Low-resolution video capture
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Samsung Shark 3 S3550
- Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Shark 2 S5550 vs. Samsung SGH-G600
Samsung Shark 2 S5550
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Samsung SGH-G600
- Small dimensions (3.97 x 1.85 x 0.58 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Shark 2 S5550 vs. Samsung Shark S5350
Samsung Shark 2 S5550
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Samsung Shark S5350
- Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches inches)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Shark 2 S5550 vs. Samsung Primo
Samsung Shark 2 S5550
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Shark 2 S5550 vs. Samsung Galaxy Y
Samsung Shark 2 S5550
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Samsung Galaxy Y
- Small dimensions (4.09 x 2.28 x 0.45 inches inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (133 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Shark 2 S5550 vs. Nokia C3 Touch and Type
Samsung Shark 2 S5550
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Nokia C3 Touch and Type
- Small dimensions (4.37 x 1.87 x 0.43 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Shark 2 S5550 vs. Samsung Galaxy Pocket
Samsung Shark 2 S5550
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Samsung Galaxy Pocket
- Small dimensions (4.08 x 2.26 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
