x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Samsung Shark 2 S5550 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Samsung Shark 2 S5550 Samsung Shark 2 S5550


  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Samsung Shark 3 S3550 Samsung Shark 3 S3550


  • Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 200 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 2 S5550 Samsung Shark 2 S5550


  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Samsung Shark S5350 Samsung Shark S5350


  • Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 2 S5550 Samsung Shark 2 S5550


  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Mythic Samsung Mythic


  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 223 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 360 x 640 pixels)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 2 S5550 Samsung Shark 2 S5550


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Samsung SGH-L700 Samsung SGH-L700


  • Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.81 x 0.50 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 2 S5550 Samsung Shark 2 S5550


  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 2 S5550 Samsung Shark 2 S5550


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Samsung S6700 Samsung S6700


  • Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.96 x 0.50 inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 2 S5550 Samsung Shark 2 S5550


  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Samsung E2600 Samsung E2600


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories