x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Samsung Shark 2 S5550 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Samsung Shark 2 S5550 Samsung Shark 2 S5550


  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Verykool R80L Granite II Verykool R80L Granite II


  • Splash-proof phone
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 2 S5550 Samsung Shark 2 S5550


  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Sony Ericsson W810 Sony Ericsson W810


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.80 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 2 S5550 Samsung Shark 2 S5550


  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

LG Cookie LG Cookie


  • Small dimensions (4.19 x 2.18 x 0.47 inches)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 155 ppi)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 2 S5550 Samsung Shark 2 S5550


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

LG ARENA LG ARENA


  • Small dimensions (4.17 x 2.18 x 0.47 inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 311 ppi)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 2 S5550 Samsung Shark 2 S5550


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Samsung Sway Samsung Sway


  • Small dimensions (4.15 x 1.96 x 0.47 inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 2 S5550 Samsung Shark 2 S5550


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Nokia C3 Touch and Type Nokia C3 Touch and Type


  • Small dimensions (4.37 x 1.87 x 0.43 inches)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 2 S5550 Samsung Shark 2 S5550


  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Samsung Shark S5350 Samsung Shark S5350


  • Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories