Samsung Shark 2 S5550 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Samsung Shark 2 S5550 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Samsung Shark 2 S5550 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung Shark 2 S5550 vs Samsung SGH-G600
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Shark 2 S5550-specific Pros & Cons
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Samsung SGH-G600-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.97 x 1.85 x 0.58 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
Samsung Shark 2 S5550 vs Nokia N86 8MP
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
Samsung Shark 2 S5550-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia N86 8MP-specific Pros & Cons
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Slow processor (434 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches)
- Too little RAM memory (75 MB RAM)
Samsung Shark 2 S5550 vs Sony Ericsson Hazel
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Samsung Shark 2 S5550-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Sony Ericsson Hazel-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
Samsung Shark 2 S5550 vs Samsung Shark S5350
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Shark 2 S5550-specific Pros & Cons
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Samsung Shark S5350-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Samsung Shark 2 S5550 vs Samsung BEAT DISC
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Shark 2 S5550-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Samsung BEAT DISC-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (179 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Samsung Shark 2 S5550 vs Samsung Star II
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Shark 2 S5550-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Samsung Star II-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Samsung Shark 2 S5550 vs Samsung Ultra S
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Shark 2 S5550-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Samsung Ultra S-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.99 x 0.50 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (179 ppi)
Samsung Shark 2 S5550 vs Samsung UltraTOUCH
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Shark 2 S5550-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Samsung UltraTOUCH-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.33 x 2.03 x 0.50 inches)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
