x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Samsung Shark 2 S5550 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Samsung Shark 2 S5550 Samsung Shark 2 S5550


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Sony Ericsson W995a Sony Ericsson W995a


  • Small dimensions (3.82 x 1.93 x 0.59 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 154 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 2 S5550 Samsung Shark 2 S5550


  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Samsung Shark 3 S3550 Samsung Shark 3 S3550


  • Small dimensions (3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 200 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 2 S5550 Samsung Shark 2 S5550


  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Samsung Shark S5350 Samsung Shark S5350


  • Small dimensions (4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 2 S5550 Samsung Shark 2 S5550


  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

LG GU295 LG GU295


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 141 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 2 S5550 Samsung Shark 2 S5550


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Nokia C6-01 Nokia C6-01


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 229 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 360 x 640 pixels)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 2 S5550 Samsung Shark 2 S5550


  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Nokia C5 5MP Nokia C5 5MP


  • Small dimensions (4.41 x 1.81 x 0.48 inches)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Shark 2 S5550 Samsung Shark 2 S5550


  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Samsung Reclaim Samsung Reclaim


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 154 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 320 x 240 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories