Samsung SPH-M520 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Samsung SPH-M520 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Samsung SPH-M520 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung SPH-M520 vs HTC Touch CDMA
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M520-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.01 x 2.04 x 0.50 inches)
HTC Touch CDMA-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Slow processor (400 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Samsung SPH-M520 vs Samsung Highnote
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M520-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.01 x 2.04 x 0.50 inches)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Highnote-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (141 ppi)
Samsung SPH-M520 vs HTC Touch Diamond CDMA
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M520-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.01 x 2.04 x 0.50 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- The camera lacks autofocus
HTC Touch Diamond CDMA-specific Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (286 ppi)
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (288 MB RAM)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Samsung SPH-M520 vs RIM BlackBerry Curve 8530
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M520-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.01 x 2.04 x 0.50 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
RIM BlackBerry Curve 8530-specific Pros & Cons
none
Samsung SPH-M520 vs Samsung SPH-M330
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.01 x 2.04 x 0.50 inches vs 3.70 x 1.78 x 0.59 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M520-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Samsung SPH-M330-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (102 ppi)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Samsung SPH-M520 vs HTC P4000 Titan
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M520-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.01 x 2.04 x 0.50 inches)
HTC P4000 Titan-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Slow processor (384 MHz)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.72 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Samsung SPH-M520 vs LG LX370
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M520-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.01 x 2.04 x 0.50 inches)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
LG LX370-specific Pros & Cons
none
Samsung SPH-M520 vs Palm Pixi
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.01 x 2.04 x 0.50 inches vs 4.37 x 2.17 x 0.43 inches)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M520-specific Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Palm Pixi-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
