Samsung SPH-M500 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Samsung SPH-M500 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Samsung SPH-M500 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung SPH-M500 vs Samsung M360
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M500 vs Samsung SPH-M610
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M500-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
Samsung SPH-M500 vs Samsung SPH-M320
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M500 vs HTC Touch CDMA
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M500-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
HTC Touch CDMA-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Slow processor (400 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Samsung SPH-M500 vs LG Remarq
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M500-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
Samsung SPH-M500 vs Motorola i890
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches vs 0.67 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M500 vs Samsung SPH-M240
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches vs 0.74 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M500-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Samsung SPH-M500 vs Sanyo S1
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M500-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus




