Samsung SPH-M320 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Samsung SPH-M320 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Samsung SPH-M320 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung SPH-M320 vs Samsung C3520
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches vs 0.66 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M320-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Samsung C3520-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Samsung SPH-M320 vs Sanyo PRO-700
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches vs 0.80 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M320-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Sanyo PRO-700-specific Pros & Cons
none
Samsung SPH-M320 vs Samsung SPH-M610
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M320-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Samsung SPH-M610-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.98 x 2.05 x 0.47 inches)
Samsung SPH-M320 vs Motorola RAZR2 V9m
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M320-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Motorola RAZR2 V9m-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.05 x 2.08 x 0.46 inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
Samsung SPH-M320 vs Samsung M360
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M320-specific Pros & Cons
none
Samsung M360-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
Samsung SPH-M320 vs Samsung C3011
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M320-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Samsung C3011-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.35 x 1.80 x 0.48 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (102 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Samsung SPH-M320 vs Samsung SPH-M500
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M320-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Samsung SPH-M500-specific Pros & Cons
none
Samsung SPH-M320 vs Motorola RAZR VE20
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches vs 0.64 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M320-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Motorola RAZR VE20-specific Pros & Cons
none
