Samsung SPH-M300 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Samsung SPH-M300 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Samsung SPH-M300 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung SPH-M300 vs LG Lotus Elite
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M300-specific Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (8 MB RAM)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Samsung SPH-M300 vs Samsung Epic 4G Touch
Common for both Pros & Cons
noneSamsung SPH-M300-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (8 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M300 vs Samsung Reclaim
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M300-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (8 MB RAM)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung SPH-M300 vs Samsung Convoy 2
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches vs 0.85 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (8 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M300 vs Apple iPhone 4S
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Samsung SPH-M300-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (8 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Apple iPhone 4S-specific Pros & Cons
- Dual core processor
- Thin body, measuring less than 9.5mm/0.37inches (0.37 inches)
- Dual-mode CDMA/GSM phone
- Small dimensions (4.54 x 2.31 x 0.37 inches)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (330 ppi)
- High-resolution display (640 x 960 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Samsung SPH-M300 vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Common for both Pros & Cons
noneSamsung SPH-M300-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (8 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Galaxy S II-specific Pros & Cons
- Dual core processor
- Thin body, measuring less than 9.5mm/0.37inches (0.33 inches)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- Small dimensions (4.93 x 2.60 x 0.33 inches)
- Very fast processor (1200 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)




